COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD-HOC NETWORKS (MANET)
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD-HOC NETWORKS (MANET)
复制标题
移动自组织网络（MANET）中主动式和被动式路由协议的比较分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jogendra Kumar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Suresh Kumar;Jogendra Kumar
ad hoc网络是一种自治系统，它可以自由通信，动态地自组织成任意形成的临时网络，而不使用任何现有的网络基础设施或集中管理，提高了灵活性和降低了成本。移动自组织网络的一个重要和基本问题是路由协议设计，这是一个主要的技术挑战，因为噪声、有限范围和不安全的无线传输增加了网络的移动性和能量限制。对自组织网络的仿真为设计和改进路由协议的性能提供了一种可行的方法。主要目标是生成具有移动节点的稳定路由协议，各种路由协议的特点。本文讨论了移动自组织网络（MANET）中主动路由协议和被动路由协议两种类型的协议，并对这两种路由协议进行了定性比较。关键词自组织网络，主动路由，被动路由协议，MANET信息与运营管理杂志，ISSN: 0976-7754 & E-ISSN: 0976-7762，卷3，第1期，2012简介一个移动自组织网络（MANET）[1]组已经在IETF内形成。目标是支持具有数百个路由器的移动自组织网络并解决挑战。移动自组织网络（MANET）是由无线链路连接的移动设备组成的自配置的无基础设施网络。MANET中的每个设备都可以自由地向任何方向独立移动，因此会频繁地改变与其他设备的连接。自组织网络是移动计算机或移动节点的集合，它们相互协作转发数据包，以扩展每个节点无线网络接口的有限传输范围。每个都必须转发与其自身用途无关的流量，因此是路由器。无线网络是一种新兴的新技术，它允许用户以电子方式获取信息和服务，而不管他们的地理位置如何。无线网络可分为基础设施网络和非基础设施（ad hoc）网络两类。基础设施网络由固定网关和有线网关组成。移动主机与网络中的网桥或其通信半径内的被叫基站通信。移动设备可以在通信时进行地理上的移动。当它超出一个基站的覆盖范围时，它会连接到一个新的基站，并开始通过它进行通信。移动自组织网络起源于DARPA (PRNet)[10]和SURAN[10]项目。独立于预先建立的基础设施有几个优点，如快速和易于部署、提高灵活性和降低成本。移动自组网在非军事公共组织、商业和工业领域的应用越来越重要，包括救援任务、执法行动、协同工业机器人、校园交通管理和教育行动等。移动自组织网络提出了一些需要解决的技术和研究挑战。自组织架构有许多优点，例如自重构和对高度可变的移动特性（如功率和传输条件、流量分布和负载平衡）的适应性。这些好处带来了新的挑战，主要存在于由于节点的移动性而导致的网络拓扑的不可预测性，再加上本地广播能力，引文：Suresh Kumar和Jogendra Kumar（2012）在移动Ad-Hoc网络（Manet）中的主动和被动路由协议的比较分析。信息与运营管理学报，ISSN: 0976-7754 & E-ISSN: 0976-7762，卷3，第1期，pp-9295。版权所有©2012 Suresh Kumar和Jogendra Kumar。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议发布的开放获取文章，该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制，前提是要注明原作者和来源。
An ad hoc network is an autonomous system that can communicate freely and dynamically self organize into arbitrary forming a temporary network without the use of any existing network infrastructure or centralized administration improved flexibility and reduced cost. An important and essential issue for mobile ad hoc networks is routing protocol design that is a major technical challenge due to the noisy, limited-range, and insecure wireless transmissions added to mobility and energy constraints of the network. The use of a simulation for ad hoc networks offers a feasible way to design and improve the performance of routing protocols. The main objective is to generate stable routing protocol with mobile nodes, features of various routing protocols. In this articles discuss two types of protocols proactive routing protocol and reactive routing protocol and qualitative based comparison of both routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). KeywordsAd-hoc Networks, Proactive Routing, Reactive Routing Protocols, MANET Journal of Information and Operations Management ISSN: 0976–7754 & E-ISSN: 0976–7762 , Volume 3, Issue 1, 2012 Introduction A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) [1] group has been formed within IETF. The goal is to support mobile ad hoc networks with hundreds of routers and solve challenges. A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a self-configuring infrastructure less network of mobile devices connected by wireless links. Each device in a MANET is free to move independently in any direction, and will therefore change its links to other devices frequently. An ad hoc network is a collection of mobile computers or mobile nodes that cooperate to forward packets for each other to extend the limited transmission range of each node’s wireless network interface. Each must forward traffic unrelated to its own use, and therefore be a router. Wireless networks are an emerging new technology that will allow users to access information and services electronically, regardless of their geographic position. Wireless networks can be classified in two type’s infrastructure network and infrastructure less (ad hoc) networks. Infrastructures network consists of a network with fixed and wired gateways. A mobile host communicates with a bridge in the Network or called base station within its communication radius. The mobile unit can move geographically while it is communicating. When it goes out of range of one base station, it connects with new base station and starts communicating through it. Mobile ad hoc networks originated from the DARPA (PRNet) [10] and SURAN project [10]. Being independent on pre-established infrastructures has a several advantages such as rapid and easy to deployment improved flexibility and reduced costs .mobile ad hoc networks gain more and more importance in non military public organization, commercial and industrial areas with including applications such as rescue missions, law enforcement operations, the cooperating industrial robots, the traffic management and educational operations in campus. Mobile ad hoc networks pose several technical and research challenges that need to be addressed. Ad hoc architecture has many benefits, such as self-reconfiguration and adaptability to highly variable mobile characteristics such as power and transmission conditions, traffic distributions, and load balancing. These benefits pose new challenges which mainly reside in the unpredictability of network topology due to the mobility of nodes, which, coupled with the local broadcast capability, causCitation: Suresh Kumar and Jogendra Kumar (2012) Comparative Analysis of Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (Manet). Journal of Information and Operations Management ISSN: 0976–7754 & E-ISSN: 0976–7762, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp-9295. Copyright: Copyright©2012 Suresh Kumar and Jogendra Kumar . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.