Subception: fact or artifact?

Subception: fact or artifact?
复制标题

服从:事实还是人造物?

DOI:
10.1037/h0044441
复制
发表时间:
1956
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
C. W. Eriksen
C. W. Eriksen
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. W. Eriksen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

“本文表明,Lazarus 和 McCleary 报告的分段效应(参见 25:7840)可以表示为 GSR 和刺激之间的部分相关性,而言语反应保持不变。获得这种部分相关性的一般情况是 GSR 和言语反应与刺激独立相关,但不是完全相关,并且这两个反应系统中的误差项彼此并不完全相关。GSR 和言语反应之间的非相关误差的几个来源考虑了口头反应系统。”(PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA,保留所有权利)
" The present paper has shown that the subseption effect reported by Lazarus and McCleary,(see 25: 7840), can be formulated as a partial correlation between the GSR and the stimulus with the verbal response held constant. The general case where such a partial correlation would be obtained is where both the GSR and verbal response are independently correlated with the stimulus, but not perfectly, and the error terms in these two response systems are not perfectly correlated with each other. Several sources of noncorrelated error between the GSR and the verbal response systems were considered."(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)