Postmodern urbanism

Postmodern urbanism
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/1467-8306.00084
复制
发表时间:
1998-03-01
期刊:
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Flusty, S
Flusty, S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dear, M;Flusty, S

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

城市结构理论是一种稀缺商品。20世纪的大多数分析都是基于芝加哥学派的同心圆模型,尽管存在明显的竞争模型。本文考察了南加州城市主义的当代形式,作为推导“后现代城市主义”概念的第一步。洛杉矶模式由几个基本特征组成,包括全球与地方的联系,无处不在的社会两极分化,以及腹地组织中心的城市过程的重新领土化(与芝加哥模式直接矛盾)。由此产生的城市主义以一种被称为“基诺资本主义”的无中心城市形式为特征,我们将其作为比较城市分析研究议程的基础。
Theories of urban structure are a scarce commodity. Most twentieth-century analyses have been predicated on the Chicago School model of concentric :ones, despite the obvious claims of competing models. This paper examines the contemporary forms of Southern California urbanism as an initial step toward deriving a concept of "postmodern urbanism." The Los Angeles model consists of several fundamental characteristics, including a global-local connection, a ubiquitous social polarization, and a reterritorialization of the urban process in which hinterland organizes the center (in direct contradiction to the Chicago model). The resultant urbanism is distinguished by a centerless urban form termed "keno capitalism," which we advance as the basis for a research agenda in comparative urban analysis.