Agribusiness vs. Public Health: Disease Control in Resource-Asymmetric Conflict
Agribusiness vs. Public Health: Disease Control in Resource-Asymmetric Conflict
复制标题
农业综合企业与公共卫生：资源不对称冲突中的疾病控制
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. B. Wallace
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Wallace;Alex Liebman;L. Bergmann;R. B. Wallace
在现代文明的背景下，传染病的生态学不能像许多建模文献所假设的那样仅通过相互作用的人群来描述。作为首要原则，形式主义及其统计应用必须考虑病原体出现的人类圈。考虑到这一目标，我们首先正式研究通过人类机构帮助制定的环境随机性来控制疫情的策略。接下来，我们利用数据率定理，探讨资源丰富的农业企业利益与受这些资源限制的州公共卫生机构和当地社区之间的不对称冲突下的疾病控制方案。军事理论描述了面对这种不平衡时取得的令人惊讶的成功，我们在此应用这一结果。绑架指出了公共卫生可以击败农业企业控制农业主导的流行病的策略，跨国公司通常将沉重的健康和财政成本转嫁给公众。
In the context of modern civilization, the ecology of infectious disease cannot be described by interacting populations alone, as much of the mod-eling literature presumes. As a matter of first principle, formalisms and their statistical applications must account for the anthrosphere from which pathogens emerge. With that objective in mind, we first formally examine strategies for controlling outbreaks by way of environmental stochastic-ities human institutions help set. Using the Data Rate Theorem, we next explore disease control regimens under asymmetric conflicts between agribusiness interests rich in resources and State public health agencies and local communities constrained by those very resources. Military theory describes surprising successes in the face of such an imbalance, a result we apply here. Abduction points to strategies by which public health can defeat agribusinesses in its efforts to control agriculture-led pandemics, the heavy health and fiscal costs of which multinationals routinely pass off to the public.