Estimation of low-density lipoprotein by the Friedewald formula and by electrophoresis compared.
Estimation of low-density lipoprotein by the Friedewald formula and by electrophoresis compared.
复制标题
通过弗里德瓦尔德公式和电泳法估算低密度脂蛋白。
DOI：
10.1093/clinchem/31.10.1762a
复制
发表时间：
1985
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
G. Clement
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Niedbala;K. Schray;R. Foery;G. Clement
HDL，极低密度脂蛋白，总胆固醇和甘油三酯。我们使用方差分析（ANOVA）多元回归统计包(4)比较了LDLe和ldlzby的不同甘油三酯浓度、LDLZJ、年龄和性别。最后，在总体结果的基础上，我们比较了LDL与由Friedewald公式确定的LDLj，使用从4.0到6.0的值，以0.2的增量代替标准的5.0值。从表1可以看出，随着甘油三酯浓度的增加，相关性略有下降，最高可达9.0 g/L。LDLXJ在1.75和2.0 g/L或以下不变（表1）。同样，我们也没有看到年龄或性别方面的显著差异。LDL51与LDL的平均差异为0.0987 g/L。当LDL1浓度减去0.0987 g/L时，LDL与
HDL, very-low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and triglyceride. We compared LDLe and LDLcafrby using the ANOVA mtiple regressions sta-tistical package (4) for various concentrations of triglyceride, LDLZJ,, age, and sex. Finally, on the basis of results for the total population, we compared LDL with LDLj determined from the Friedewald formula, using values from 4.0 to 6.0, in 0.2 increments, substituted for the standard 5.0 value. As seen in Table 1, as the concentration of triglyceride increased, the correlation decreased slightly up to 9.0 g/L. LDLXJ, was unchanged at or below 1.75 and 2.0 g/L (Table 1). Likewise, we saw no significant difference in correlation with respect to age or sex. The average difference between LDL51 and LDL, was 0.0987 g/L. When 0.0987 g/L was subtracted from LDL1 concentrations, the coefficient for the correlation between LDL and