[Distribution patterns of giant panda in Guanyinshan and Foping nature reserves].
[Distribution patterns of giant panda in Guanyinshan and Foping nature reserves].
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Qingci Cao;Yun Zhu;Yingzhen Ruan;Li-jun Yong;Xiao-hong Wang;Wenhu Zhang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Qingci Cao;Yun Zhu;Yingzhen Ruan;Li-jun Yong;Xiao-hong Wang;Wenhu Zhang
2007年10月和2008年4月，采用样线法调查了佛坪和观音山自然保护区大熊猫种群及其同域伴生野生动物的分布格局，并分析了影响大熊猫活动空间分布的环境因素。两个保护区的大熊猫种群及其伴生野生动物种群分布格局相似，但观音山的大熊猫密度和分布范围均小于佛坪。大熊猫在佛坪有两个高密度分布区，而观音山大部分地区没有活动痕迹。观音山的红豆杉（Budorcas taxicolor）、红豆杉（Naemorhedus goral）和红豆杉（Sus scrofa）活性痕迹较佛平多。人为干扰可能影响大熊猫的分布格局。
By using line transect method, the distribution patterns of giant panda population and its sympatric companion wildlife species in Foping and Guanyinshan nature reserves were investigated in October 2007 and April 2008, and the environmental factors affecting the spatial distribution of giant panda activity were analyzed. The giant panda population and its sympatric companion wildlife species in the two reserves had the similar distribution patterns, and the density and distribution range of giant panda were smaller in Guanyinshan than in Foping. Giant panda had two high-density distribution areas in Foping, but no activity trace in most parts of Guanyinshan. The activity trace of Budorcas taxicolor, Naemorhedus goral and Sus scrofa was more in Guanyinshan than in Foping. Anthropogenic interference might affect the distribution pattern of giant panda.