Preoperative versus postoperative chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.
Preoperative versus postoperative chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.
复制标题
局部进展期胃癌术前与术后放化疗的比较:多中心倾向评分匹配分析
DOI:
10.1186/s12885-022-09297-7
复制
发表时间:
2022-02-26
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Jin J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li N;Xiang X;Zhao D;Wang X;Tang Y;Chi Y;Yang L;Jiang L;Jiang J;Shi J;Liu W;Fang H;Tang Y;Chen B;Lu N;Jing H;Qi S;Wang S;Liu Y;Song Y;Li Y;Zhang L;Jin J
Peri-operative chemo-radiotherapyplayed important rolein locally advanced gastric cancer. Whether preoperative strategy can improve the long-term prognosis compared with postoperative treatment is unclear. The study purpose to compare oncologic outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (pre-CRT) and postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (post-CRT). From January 2009 to April 2019, 222 patients from 2 centers with stage T3/4 and/or N positive gastric cancer who received pre-CRT and post-CRT were included. After propensity score matching (PSM), comparisons of local regional control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test between pre- and post-CRT groups. The median follow-up period was 30 months. 120 matched cases were generated for analysis. Three-year LC, DMFS, DFS and OS for pre- vs. post-CRT groups were 93.8% vs. 97.2% (p = 0.244), 78.7% vs. 65.7% (p = 0.017), 74.9% vs. 65.3% (p = 0.042) and 74.4% vs. 61.2% (p = 0.055), respectively. Pre-CRT were significantly associated with DFS in uni- and multi-variate analysis. Preoperative CRT showed advantages of oncologic outcome compared with postoperative CRT. ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01291407, NCT03427684 and NCT04062058, date of registration: Feb 8, 2011.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
51.1
作者:
Cats, Annemieke;Jansen, Edwin P. M.;Verheij, Marcel
通讯作者:
Verheij, Marcel
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Xue, Kan;Ying, Xiangji;Ji, Jiafu
通讯作者:
Ji, Jiafu
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Park, Se Hoon;Sohn, Tae Sung;Kang, Won Ki
通讯作者:
Kang, Won Ki
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Lee, Jeeyun;Lim, Do Hoon;Kang, Won Ki
通讯作者:
Kang, Won Ki
影响因子:
50.5
作者:
Klevebro, F.;von Dobeln, G. Alexandersson;Nilsson, M.
通讯作者:
Nilsson, M.