TEST‐RETEST RELIABILITY OF THREE SCALES DERIVED FROM A QUANTITY‐FREQUENCY‐VARIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELF‐REPORTED ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION *
TEST‐RETEST RELIABILITY OF THREE SCALES DERIVED FROM A QUANTITY‐FREQUENCY‐VARIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELF‐REPORTED ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION *
复制标题
根据自我报告的酒精消耗量的数量-频率-变异性评估得出的三个量表的测试-再测试可靠性*
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1976
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
V. Buffington
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Streissguth;D. Martin;V. Buffington
Since the early 1950s, when Maxwell’ and Straus and Bacon2 published a quantity-frequency approach to estimating alcohol consumption, this procedure, with various modifications, has been widely used, especially for studying drinking habits in large populations. Because many inferences are made about the actual drinking habits of persons based on self-reports of their drinking practices, the stability of the self-report of drinking behavior over time is a relevant issue. The question with which we are concerned is: If a person is classified as a “heavy drinker” or a “light drinker” on the basis of a n interview given today, will he still be classified as a “heavy drinker” or a “light drinker” when given the same interview in about a week? This paper discusses the reliability of the classification of subjects’ alcohol consumption, based on their self-reports of drinking behavior obtained through a quantity-frequency-variability (QFV) interview. Only Edwards et al.3 have reported on the test-retest reliability of self-reports of alcohol consumption. Because their procedure for obtaining and scoring the data differed considerably from the procedures commonly used in this country, the present study was designed. The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term test-retest reliability of three alcohol consumption scores, all derived from the same interview: the absolute alcohol (AA) score, from Jessor et al.,4 the QFV index, and the volume variability (VV) index, both developed by Cahalan et al.5