Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children.
Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children.
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Robbins;J. Renshaw;S. W. Berry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Robbins;J. Renshaw;S. W. Berry
有意义的听觉整合量表(MAIS)是为了评估深度听力障碍儿童在日常生活中对声音的有意义的使用而开发的。有关在日常情况下使用声音的信息是通过家长访谈技术获得的。实验1报告了使用助听器、单通道人工耳蜗术、多通道人工耳蜗术或双通道触觉助听器的儿童使用该量表获得的初步结果。助听器使用者的父母认为，与植入物或触觉助听器的使用者相比，助听器使用者在日常情况下使用声音的程度更高。有一种趋势是，多通道人工耳蜗者的表现略高于单通道人工耳蜗者。触觉辅助使用者的父母认为，他们在最有限的范围内以有意义的方式使用声音。实验2报告了在纵向基础上获得的MAI分数。研究结果表明，在使用每种感官辅助工具的儿童中，随着时间的推移，有意义的听觉整合继续发展。
The Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) was developed to evaluate meaningful use of sound in everyday situations by profoundly hearing-impaired children. Information about the use of sound in everyday situations is obtained with a parent interview technique. Initial findings obtained with this scale are reported in Experiment 1 for children who use a hearing aid, single-channel cochlear implant, multichannel cochlear implant, or two-channel tactile aid. The hearing aid users were perceived by their parents to use sound in everyday situations to a greater extent than were the users of either implant or the tactile aid. There was a trend toward slightly higher performance by the multi- than by the single-channel cochlear implant users. The tactile aid users were perceived by their parents to use sound in a meaningful way to the most limited extent. Scores on the MAIS, which were obtained on a longitudinal basis, are reported in Experiment 2. The findings suggest that meaningful auditory integration continued to develop over time in children who used each type of sensory aid.