Prognostic significance of immune cells in non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis.

Prognostic significance of immune cells in non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis.
复制标题

免疫细胞在非小细胞肺癌中的预后意义:荟萃分析

DOI:
10.18632/oncotarget.24835
复制
发表时间:
2018-05-15
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Soong R
Soong R
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Soo RA;Chen Z;Yan Teng RS;Tan HL;Iacopetta B;Tai BC;Soong R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

肿瘤相关免疫细胞在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中具有预后作用,但研究结果相互矛盾。根据NSCLC患者的定位确定免疫细胞的预后作用。对树突状细胞(DC)、肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAM)、肥大细胞(MC)、自然杀伤(NK)细胞、T和B细胞以及肿瘤CTLA-4和PD-L1研究进行了系统性文献综述和荟萃分析。我们分析了96篇文章(n= 21,752例患者)。随着肿瘤DC的增加,(总生存期(OS)风险比(HR)0.55; 95%置信区间(CI)0.44-0.68),NK细胞(OS HR 0.45; 0.31-0.65),TAM(OS HR 0.33; 0.17-0.62),M1 TAM(OS HR 0.10; 0.05-0.21),CD 3 + T细胞(疾病特异性存活(DSS)HR 0.64; 0.48-0.86),CD 8 + T细胞(OS HR 0.78; 0.66-0.93),B细胞(OS HR 0.65; 0.42-0.99)和基质DC增加(DSS HR 0.62; 0.47-0.83),NK细胞(DSS HR 0.51; 0.32-0.82),M1 TAM(OS HR 0.63; 0.42-0.94)、CD 4 + T细胞(OS HR 0.45; 0.21-0.94)、CD 8 + T细胞(OS HR 0.77; 0.69-0.86)和B细胞(OS HR 0.74;0.56-0.99)。基质M2 TAM(OS HR 1.44; 1.06-1.96)和TNM(无复发生存期(RFS)HR 1.80; 1.34-2.43)的结局较差。肿瘤PD-L1与更差的OS(1.40; 1.20-1.69)、RFS(1.67)和DFS(1.24)相关。肿瘤和间质DC、NK细胞、M1 TAM、CD 8 + T细胞和B细胞与改善的预后相关,而肿瘤PD-L1、间质M2 TAM和Treg细胞的预后较差。需要更高质量的研究来确认。
Tumor-associated immune cells are prognostic in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but findings have been conflicting. To determine the prognostic role of immune cells according to localization in NSCLC patients. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed on dendritic cell (DC), tumor associated macrophages (TAM), mast cells (MC), natural killer (NK) cells, T and B cells and tumor CTLA-4 and PD-L1 studies. We analysed 96 articles (n= 21,752 patients). Improved outcomes were seen with increased tumor DCs (overall survival (OS) hazard ratio (HR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.68), NK cells (OS HR 0.45; 0.31–0.65), TAMs (OS HR 0.33; 0.17–0.62), M1 TAMs (OS HR 0.10; 0.05–0.21), CD3+ T cells (disease specific survival (DSS) HR 0.64; 0.48–0.86), CD8+ T cells (OS HR 0.78; 0.66–0.93), B cells (OS HR 0.65; 0.42–0.99) and with increased stroma DC (DSS HR 0.62; 0.47–0.83), NK cells (DSS HR 0.51; 0.32–0.82), M1 TAMs (OS HR 0.63; 0.42–0.94), CD4+ T cells (OS HR 0.45; 0.21–0.94), CD8+ T cells (OS HR 0.77; 0.69–0.86) and B cells (OS HR 0.74;0.56–0.99). Poor outcomes were seen with stromal M2 TAMs (OS HR 1.44; 1.06–1.96) and Tregs (relapse free survival (RFS) HR 1.80; 1.34–2.43). Tumor PD-L1 was associated with worse OS (1.40; 1.20–1.69), RFS (1.67) and DFS (1.24). Tumor and stroma DC, NK cells, M1 TAMs, CD8+ T cells and B cells were associated with improved prognosis and tumor PD-L1, stromal M2 TAMs and Treg cells had poorer prognosis. Higher quality studies are required for confirmation.