Human rights, politics, and reviews of research ethics
Human rights, politics, and reviews of research ethics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09465-5
复制
发表时间：
2002-07-20
期刊：
影响因子：
168.9
通讯作者：
Kass, NE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Beyrer, C;Kass, NE
虽然人权运动和研究伦理领域有重叠的原则和目标，但很少有人试图将外部政治和人权背景纳入研究伦理守则或伦理审查。研究伦理审查的每一个要素--风险和收益的平衡、个体参与者权利的保证以及研究人群的公平选择--都可能受到研究所处的政治和人权背景的影响。如果在一个政府可能违反研究结果保密性或研究结果可能被用于驱逐出境难民群体的国家实施，一开始似乎风险低的研究可能会变得风险高。研究人员应确定是否可以或应该通过咨询人权组织来进行研究，并在可能的情况下咨询一位值得信赖的同事，以了解他们打算进行研究的背景政治背景和人权状况。
Although the human rights movement and the sphere of research ethics have overlapping principles and goals, there has been little attempt to incorporate external political and human rights contexts Into research ethics codes or ethics reviews. Every element of a research ethics review-the balance of risks and benefits, the assurance of rights for Individual participants, and the fair selection of research populations-can be affected by the political and human rights background in which a study Is done. Research that at first seems to be low In risk may become high In risk If implemented in a country where the government might breach the confidentiality of study results or where results might be used to deport a refugee group. Researchers should determine whether research could or should be done by consulting human rights organisations and, when possible, a trusted colleague, to learn the background political context and human rights conditions of the settings In which they propose to do research.