Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus S-1, S-1 Alone, or Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST Study

Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus S-1, S-1 Alone, or Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST Study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1200/jco.2012.43.3680
复制
发表时间:
2013-05-01
影响因子:
45.3
通讯作者:
Tanaka, Masao
Tanaka, Masao
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ueno, Hideki;Ioka, Tatsuya;Tanaka, Masao

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目前的III期研究旨在探讨S-1单用的非劣势以及吉西他滨加S-1与单用吉西他滨相比在总生存率方面的优势。患者和方法受试者为局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌化疗初期患者。患者被随机分配到单用吉西他滨(1,000 mg/m~2,28天为一周期),S-1(42天周期的第1天至28天的体表面积为80,100或120 mg/d),或吉西他滨加S-1(吉西他滨1,000 mg/m2,21天的周期第1天和第8天,加S-1 60,80或100 mg/d,根据21天周期的体表面积,60,80或100 mg/d)。中位总生存期吉西他滨组为8.8月,S-1组为9.7个月,吉西他滨+S-1组为10.1个月。S-1与吉西他滨具有非劣势(危险比0.96;97.5%CI,0.78~1.18;P<非劣势.001),而吉西他滨与S-1联用则无明显优势(危险比0.88;97.5%CI,0.71~1.08;P=.15)。所有治疗方案的耐受性良好,但吉西他滨联合S-1组的血液学和胃肠道反应比吉西他滨组严重。结论S-1单药治疗胰腺癌的总生存率不低于吉西他滨,耐受性好,是治疗局部晚期和转移性胰腺癌的一种方便的口服药物。J Clin Oncol31:1640-1648。(C)美国临床肿瘤学会2013年
PurposeThe present phase III study was designed to investigate the noninferiority of S-1 alone and superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 compared with gemcitabine alone with respect to overall survival.Patients and MethodsThe participants were chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive only gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), only S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 28 of a 42-day cycle), or gemcitabine plus S-1 (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/d according to body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle).ResultsIn the total of 834 enrolled patients, median overall survival was 8.8 months in the gemcitabine group, 9.7 months in the S-1 group, and 10.1 months in the gemcitabine plus S-1 group. The noninferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine was demonstrated (hazard ratio, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.78 to 1.18; P < .001 for noninferiority), whereas the superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 was not (hazard ratio, 0.88; 97.5% CI, 0.71 to 1.08; P = .15). All treatments were generally well tolerated, although hematologic and GI toxicities were more severe in the gemcitabine plus S-1 group than in the gemcitabine group.ConclusionMonotherapy with S-1 demonstrated noninferiority to gemcitabine in overall survival with good tolerability and presents a convenient oral alternative for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 31: 1640-1648. (C) 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology