Comparing the automated versus manual method of needle biopsy for renal histology artefacts
Comparing the automated versus manual method of needle biopsy for renal histology artefacts
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/ndt/gfn061
复制
发表时间：
2008-06-01
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Mauer, Michael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Donnelly, Sandra;Goodyer, Paul;Mauer, Michael
1934年首次引入经皮肾活检，1954年引入富兰克林改进的Vim-Silverman针[1]。最近，使用弹簧式活检枪进行了肾活检[2]。虽然已经对肾活检针的组织充分性和患者安全性进行了评估，但它们对组织质量的影响以前还没有描述过。这项研究比较了两种肾活检针，14号(G)Vim-Silverman针和16G自动BioptyTM枪在电子显微镜(EM)下获得的肾组织的质量，这些组织是在进行临床试验期间获得的。
Percutaneous renal biopsy was first introduced in 1934, and the Vim-Silverman needle modified by Franklin was introduced in 1954 [1]. More recently, renal biopsies have been performed using the spring-loaded biopsy gun [2]. While renal biopsy needles have been evaluated for tissue adequacy and patient safety, their effect on the quality of the tissue has not been previously described. This study compared the quality of the renal tissue obtained for electron microscopy (EM) between two renal biopsy needles, the 14-gauge (G) Vim-Silverman needle and the 16G automated BioptyTM gun using tissues obtained during the conduct of a clinical trial.