Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge
Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00426-004-0208-3
复制
发表时间：
2005-06-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Scott, R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dienes, Z;Scott, R
本文探讨了内隐学习范式中意识知识与无意识知识的分离。使用人工语法学习任务的两个实验考察了无意识和有意识的结构知识(结构知识)的获得。将结构性知识与一个项目是否具有该结构的知识(判断知识)进行对比。对于结构知识和判断性知识，意识意识是使用主观测量来评估的。研究发现，无意识的结构性知识可以同时导致有意识和无意识的判断知识。当结构知识是无意识的时候，判断知识没有随着时间的推移变得更有意识的趋势。此外，有意识的结构性知识比无意识的结构性知识在判断中产生更一致的错误，通过寻找规则的指令促进了判断，在这种指令被次要任务损害之后。这些解离验证了意识意识的这些主观测量的使用。
This paper investigates the dissociation between conscious and unconscious knowledge in an implicit learning paradigm. Two experiments employing the artificial grammar learning task explored the acquisition of unconscious and conscious knowledge of structure (structural knowledge). Structural knowledge was contrasted to knowledge of whether an item has that structure (judgment knowledge). For both structural and judgment knowledge, conscious awareness was assessed using subjective measures. It was found that unconscious structural knowledge could lead to both conscious and unconscious judgment knowledge. When structural knowledge was unconscious, there was no tendency for judgment knowledge to become more conscious over time. Furthermore, conscious rather than unconscious structural knowledge produced more consistent errors in judgments, was facilitated by instructions to search for rules, and after such instructions was harmed by a secondary task. The dissociations validate the use of these subjective measures of conscious awareness.