Addressing Disadvantage and the Human Good
Addressing Disadvantage and the Human Good
复制标题
解决劣势和人类利益
DOI：
10.1111/1468-5930.t01-1-00216
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Wolff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Wolff
《应用哲学学会》，2002年。本文提出了一个框架，其中我们可以区分四种类型的对弱势群体的再分配关注：补偿；个人提升；有针对性的资源提升；以及地位提升。有人认为，在某些情况下，我们中的许多人会有强烈的直觉，赞成或反对一种或多种解决劣势的策略，并进一步认为，在这种情况下，我们的反应很可能是基于对人类利益的假设。因此，这两个问题--解决劣势和人类福祉--相互揭示[1]。
© Society for Applied Philosophy, 2002. This paper sets out a framework in which we can distinguish between four types of redistributive attention to the disadvantaged: compensation; personal enhancement; targeted resource enhancement; and status enhancement. It is argued that in certain cases many of us will have strong intuitions in favour or against one or more strategies for addressing disadvantage, and it is further argued that in such cases it is likely that our reactions are based on assumptions about the human good. Hence the two issues — addressing disadvantage and the human good — shed light on one another [1].