Essay review: Ernst Mayr on the history of biology
Essay review: Ernst Mayr on the history of biology
复制标题
论文评论:恩斯特·迈尔论生物学史
DOI:
10.1007/bf00127960
复制
发表时间:
1985
影响因子:
0.8
通讯作者:
P. Sloan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Sloan
As one whose first exposure to the history of biology, and to the history of science in general, was through the historical papers of Ernst Mayr (rather than the usual route through Kuhn, KoyrB, Roger, or even Radl and Nordenskiold), I approach Mayr’s newest book with a particular sense of intellectual debt. In The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982) Mayr has brought together the reflections of a lifetime of theoretical and empirical work in biology and its history, and has synthesized an important overview of the discipline. The broad aspects will be familiar to long-time readers of Mayr’s works, but never previously has such a complete statement of his views and conclusions been available.’A long prefatory discussion sets forth the basic outlines of Mayr’s conception of the history of biology. This section is followed by what I consider to be the finest single chapter of the book-a discussion of the nature of biological science, its underlying thematic issues, and its relation to the other sciences. I particularly liked the effective summary of a broad range of issues in the philosophy, methodology, and history of biology, presented in a clear and uncomplicated way. There is no better essay to give the beginning graduate student or advanced undergraduate who is interested in the history and philosophy of biology. The fundamental questions and problems in the area are all here. A selective presentation of the history of biology as it has developed since antiquity concludes the first section. The heart of the book comprises four hundred pages devoted to two long discussions of Mayr’s chief areas of professional interest, taxonomy and evolutionary theory. A lengthy section on genetics and inheritance conclude the text. Although those seeking extended discussions of morphology, embryology, or physiology would