Effect of rivaroxaban on prothrombin fragment 1+2 compared with warfarin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke: Insight from its serial measurement

Effect of rivaroxaban on prothrombin fragment 1+2 compared with warfarin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke: Insight from its serial measurement
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.011
复制
发表时间:
2016-12-01
影响因子:
7.5
通讯作者:
Okumura, Ken
Okumura, Ken
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hagii, Joji;Tomita, Hirofumi;Okumura, Ken

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Introduction: Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage during rivaroxaban treatment have small hematoma and favorable outcomes compared with those with warfarin. We investigated its possible mechanism, focusing on prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), a marker of thrombin generation.Materials and methods: In 65 patients with acute cardioembolic stroke (median 77 years), rivaroxaban was initiated at 5 days after the onset. Plasma F1 + 2 level (normal range, 69-229 pmol/L), prothrombin time (PT), and rivaroxaban concentration evaluated by anti-Xa activity were serially measured.Results: Median plasma F1 + 2 was 276 (IQR, 195-454) pmol/L before starting rivaroxaban, and significantly decreased to 196 (141-267) and 192 (151-248) on 7 and 28 days after rivaroxaban, respectively (both p < 0.05). Serial measurements of PT and rivaroxaban concentration at trough, 2, 4, and 6 h after taking rivaroxaban showed a positive correlation (R-2 = 0.69, p < 0.01). PT at 4 h after rivaroxaban was significantly prolonged compared with trough (16.6 versus 11.5 s, p < 0.0001). F1 + 2 at 4 h was also decreased compared with trough (160 (123-245.5) versus 196 (141-266.5), p = 0.04), but no patients showed F1 + 2 below the normal range at 4 h. In other 34 patients with warfarin treatment (77 years), median PT-INR and F1 + 2 were 2.06 (1.75-2.50) and 75 (48-111) (p < 0.0001 versus 4 h after rivaroxaban). Notably, of those with PT-INR = 2.0 (18/34), 12 (12/18, 67%) showed F1 + 2 below the normal range.Conclusions: Rivaroxaban retains a normal thrombin generation even at its peak level with prolonged PT, whereas warfarin at therapeutic levels inhibits thrombin generation. This may partly explain different outcomes in patients complicated with bleeding events. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.