Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
复制
发表时间：
2004-02-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Lundman, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Graneheim, UH;Lundman, B
在已发表的文献中描述的定性内容分析表明，关于概念、程序和解释的含义和使用，存在相互矛盾的意见和未解决的问题。本文概述了与定性内容分析有关的重要概念(显性和潜在性内容、分析单位、意义单位、浓缩、抽象、内容领域、代码、类别和主题)；说明了与研究程序有关的概念的使用；并提出了在整个研究程序步骤中实现可信度(可信度、可靠性和可转移性)的措施。根据沃茨拉维克等人的《S：人类交流的语用学。交互模式、病理和悖论的研究》的传播理论，讨论了定性内容分析中的解释。(C)2003年，爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.'s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton Et Company, New York, London] theory of communication. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.