Transgenic flies expressing the fluorescence calcium sensor cameleon 2.1 under UAS control
Transgenic flies expressing the fluorescence calcium sensor cameleon 2.1 under UAS control
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/gene.10112
复制
发表时间:
2002-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Buchner, E
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Diegelmann, S;Fiala, A;Buchner, E
Optical imaging of cellular calcium influx using conventional fluorescence dyes has developed to a commonly used tool. However, one drawback of conventional dyes lies in its unspecific targeting. The selection of cells that are labeled depends on the diffusion properties of the dye and the anatomy of the tissue rather than on the genetic identity or function of cells. A possibility to overcome this problem came with genetically encodable fluorescence proteins that allow for the optical recording of physiological reactions of cells, eg calcium influx (for review, see Guerrero and Isacoff, 2001). The most advanced among those probes is the calcium sensor Cameleon (Miyawaki et al., 1997), a protein consisting of an enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) and an enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP), both fused to a calmodulin sequence and the calmodulin target peptide M13 (Miyawaki et al., 1997). When excited at 440 nm wavelength, calcium influx induces a shift in the ratio of EYFP to ECFP emission as a result of a calciumdependent conformational change that leads to FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) from ECFP to EYFP (Fig. 1).Several versions of Cameleon have been reported so far. The initially described Cameleon 2.0 (Miyawaki et al., 1997) showed in its emission properties an unfavorable dependence on the pH value, a side effect that was improved in the version Cameleon 2.1 (Miyawaki et al., 1999). Recently, a novel construct, Cameleon 6.1, has been reported to give stronger signal to noise ratio (Truong et al., 2001). Cameleon has been shown to work in cell culture on the subcellular level (Foyouzi-Youssefi et al., 2000; Emmanouilidou et al., 1999) and in a neuronal and muscular preparation of C. elegans (Kerr et al., 2000). Optical recordings at the larval neuromuscular junction of Drosophila using Cameleon 2.0 under UAS control has also been successful (Reiff et al., unpublished research). We now report five lines of transgenic flies expressing Cameleon 2.1 under the control of a UAS promotor, thereby exploiting Drosophila’s advantage of targeting the sensor to a genetically defined population of cells using specific Gal 4 lines. Figure 2 lists the exact P-element insert location for each fly line. By Western blot analysis we determined the line Cam 2.1/82 to show the strongest Cameleon 2.1 expression in the brain when driven by the strong panneuronal Gal 4 driver