Understanding intractable environmental policy conflicts: the case of the village that would not fall quietly into the sea
Understanding intractable environmental policy conflicts: the case of the village that would not fall quietly into the sea
复制标题
解读棘手的环境政策冲突：不会悄然落入大海的村庄案例
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mark G. L. Tebboth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mark G. L. Tebboth
海岸侵蚀是一个情绪化的问题，人们持有根深蒂固的观点，这些观点往往抵制以协商一致的方式来确定双方都能接受的解决方案。本研究以英格兰东安格利亚海岸的哈皮斯堡村为案例研究，分析了海岸侵蚀问题是如何被框架化的，以及不同框架的存在是否会成为利益相关者之间建立共识的障碍。该研究利用框架理论和文化理论来了解英国政府和海岸关注行动小组（CCAG）（一个总部位于哈比斯堡的当地压力团体）如何沟通和看待海岸侵蚀问题。此外，该研究还探讨了理解海岸侵蚀的不同方式是否会在社区内部产生共鸣。使用多种方法（政策话语和媒体框架分析）来确定海岸侵蚀的主要框架。通过后续焦点小组的问卷调查，这些框架的共鸣在哈皮斯堡社区进行了测试。研究表明，政府关于海岸侵蚀的论述具有许多与文化理论的等级世界观相关的特征。相反，CCAG的话语可以比喻为平等主义立场。人们发现哈皮斯堡社区强烈同意代表平等主义世界观的言论。此外，与更普遍地对待自然的态度相比，人们对海岸侵蚀的看法更加一致。该研究的结论是，不同的框架阻碍了达成共识。应努力制定治理解决方案来解决明确的分歧（本研究中揭示的），同时承认这些差异的隐含根源。
Coastal erosion is an emotive issue with deeply held views that are often resistant to consensual approaches to identify mutually acceptable solutions. Using the village of Happisburgh on the East Anglian coast in England as a case study, this research analyses how the issue of coastal erosion has been framed and whether the presence of different frames acts as a barrier to building consensus between stakeholders. The study uses Frame Theory and Cultural Theory to understand how the UK Government and the Coastal Concern Action Group (CCAG), a local pressure group based in Happisburgh, communicate and perceive the issue of coastal erosion. Additionally, the study explores whether the different ways of understanding coastal erosion resonate within the community itself. A multi-method approach was used (policy discourse and media frame analysis) to identify the dominant framings of coastal erosion. The resonance of these frames was tested within the community of Happisburgh through a questionnaire with follow-up focus groups. The study revealed that the Government discourse of coastal erosion shares many of the characteristics associated with Cultural Theory's hierarchical worldview. Conversely, CCAG's discourse can be likened to the egalitarian position. The community of Happisburgh was found to strongly agree with the discourse that is representative of an egalitarian worldview. Furthermore, there was an increased uniformity of views regarding coastal erosion compared with attitudes towards nature more generally. The study concludes that different framings act as a barrier to building consensus. Efforts should be made to develop governance solutions to tackle the explicit disagreements (revealed in this study) whilst acknowledging the more implicit origins of these differences.
气候变化传播的理论和语言
DOI：
10.1002/wcc.2
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
WIREs Climate Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nerlich B
通讯作者：
Nerlich B