Comparison of Real and Simulated Driving for a Static Driving Simulator

Comparison of Real and Simulated Driving for a Static Driving Simulator
复制标题

静态驾驶模拟器的真实驾驶与模拟驾驶比较

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Bengler
K. Bengler
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michael Krause;L. Yilmaz;K. Bengler

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

智能手机上的交通灯助手在实验中用于真实和模拟驾驶。测试对象的超速行为通过超过速度限制 5 公里/小时以上的行驶距离、NASA-RTLX 的主观评分、一般燃油减少和发生加速度的比较来评估。实际驾驶和模拟驾驶的超速降低在数值上显示出不同的值,但两者都存在降低效果;实际效果较小。根据主观评分,模拟器驾驶的要求往往更高。在模拟器中发现的绿波协调的燃油减少效果也可以在实际交通中找到,但效果也较低。实验表明任何指标都没有绝对有效性,但某些指标具有相对有效性。静态驾驶模拟器的真实驾驶与模拟驾驶比较(可下载 PDF)。来源:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275716457_Comparison_of_Real_and_Simulated_Driving_for_a_Static_Driving_Simulator [2016 年 5 月 1 日访问]。
A traffic light assistant on a smartphone is used in real and simulated driving in an experiment. The speeding behavior of the test subjects is assessed as metric of travelled distance with more than 5 km/h above the speed limit, subjective scores by NASA-RTLX, general fuel reduction and comparison of occurring accelerations. The speeding reduction showed numerically not the same values for real and simulated driving, but the reduction effect was present in both; in real with the smaller effect. According to subjective ratings the simulator driving is judged in tendency more demanding. A fuel reduction effect for the green wave coordination found in the simulator could also be found in real traffic, but also with lower effect. The experiments revealed no absolute validity for any metric, but relative validity for some metrics. Comparison of Real and Simulated Driving for a Static Driving Simulator (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275716457_Comparison_of_Real_and_Simulated_Driving_for_a_Static_Driving_Simulator [accessed May 1, 2016].