A Snake in the Nest or in a Snake's Nest: What Counts as Peer Review for a Female Science Educator in a Chemistry Department?
A Snake in the Nest or in a Snake's Nest: What Counts as Peer Review for a Female Science Educator in a Chemistry Department?
复制标题
蛇在巢中还是蛇在蛇巢中：化学系女性科学教育者的同行评审算什么？
DOI：
10.1023/a:1016069826685
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
K. Scantlebury
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Scantlebury
在我被任命为化学和生物化学系的女权主义科学教育家之前，我与未来的同事和同行讨论了评估我的任期和晋升申请的标准。本文讨论了这一过程，以及我通过研究项目和出版物的外部资金获得的文化和社会资本。这些活动依赖于同行评审，然而，问题是谁被认为是一个女性主义科学教育家的同行？我还强调了一个持续的关注，目前很少有女性化学家在较高水平的同行评审在美国和这对初级女教师的影响。
Prior to my appointment as a feminist science educator in a chemistry and biochemistry department, I engaged in a discussion with my future colleagues and peers on the criteria for evaluating my tenure and promotion application. This paper discusses that process and the cultural and social capital I garnered through external funding of research projects and the publications. These activities rely on peer review, however, the question is raised who is considered a peer for a feminist science educator? I also highlight an ongoing concern that there are currently few women chemists at the higher levels of peer review in the United States and the implications this has for junior female faculty.