The treatment of oesophageal perforations.

The treatment of oesophageal perforations.
复制标题

食管穿孔的治疗。

DOI:
10.3109/14017437809100364
复制
发表时间:
1978
期刊:
Scandinavian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Henze
A. Henze
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Bergdahl;A. Henze

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本报告回顾了 20 年来在瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Karolinska Sjukhuset 胸外科诊所治疗的连续 24 例食管穿孔病例。食管内固定术后发生 14 例穿孔,其中 5 例是异物穿孔,5 例是自发性穿孔。六名患者经过保守治疗并存活下来。接受引流和抗生素治疗的 10 名患者中有 2 人死于纵隔炎。 8 名患者进行了穿孔闭合手术,其中 1 人死于纵隔炎。住院时间分别为22天、61天和32天。通过对食管穿孔文献(290例)的调查,发现主要影响预后的因素有3个。首先,治疗方式与早期死亡率有关,保守治疗期间死亡18%,引流后死亡30%,修复后死亡16%。其次,穿孔的类型似乎是结果的另一个决定因素。器械穿孔与 l...
This report reviews 24 consecutive cases of oesophageal perforation which were treated during a 20-year-period at the Thoracic Surgical Clinic, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. Fourteen perforations followed oesophageal instrumentation, 5 were due to foreign bodies and 5 were spontaneous. Six patients were treated conservatively and survived. Two of 10 patients treated with drainage and antibiotics died of mediastinitis. Surgical closure of the perforation was performed in 8 patients, one of whom died of mediastinitis. The periods of hospitalization were 22, 61 and 32 days, respectively. A survey of the literature on oesophageal perforation (290 cases) revealed 3 factors which mainly affected the prognosis. Firstly, the mode of treatment related to the early mortality rate in that 18% died during conservative treatment, 30% after drainage and 16% following repair. Secondly, the type of perforation appeared to be another determinant of the outcome. Instrumental perforations were associated with a l...