Translating National Policy to Improve Environmental Conditions Impacting Public Health Through Community Planning

Translating National Policy to Improve Environmental Conditions Impacting Public Health Through Community Planning
复制标题

通过社区规划转化国家政策以改善影响公共卫生的环境条件

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-75361-4
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
B. Fiedler
B. Fiedler
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Fiedler

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我怎么会在这里?”(Byrne和Eno。Once In A Lifetime-Talking Heads(英语:Talking Heads)Sire Records,Philadelphia,PA; 1980)。在一个经济驱动的社会中,大规模政策的制定和实施问题是基本冲突的基础。也就是说,经济增长通常会耗尽资源,减少生态系统服务,导致负面的环境外部因素,进而影响社会福利。但国家政策仍然将经济增长作为社会成功的主要指标,即使成功的实现损害了全球资源稀缺,导致儿童死亡率,肥胖症,无法获得清洁水,不安全的社区,不确定的公民身份以及类似的问题。所有这些负面的环境条件都对健康状况产生了至关重要的影响,无论是不发达国家、新兴国家还是工业化国家。在这个多维度的政治、社会、经济、行为、生命科学和公共卫生困境中,由于治理模式依赖于经济学、历史学和生态学的基础,这是每个学者存在的三重祸根,因此要解决这些差异是很棘手的。然而,如果没有这一基础,就会失去产生渐进和可持续变革的机会。因此,本章首先介绍经济问题,然后展开与人的发展的对照,这是执行国家经济政策的挑战的根源,也是影响一般人的发展和生活质量的地方影响。本章讨论了支持经济、人类和可持续发展的新指标的应用,最后讨论了这些指标对国家公平分配和全球经济扩张的合理限制的应用。B。A. Fiedler(*)美国佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔独立研究分析师诉意大利意大利罗马罗马三大学经济系Costantini电子邮件:valeria. uniroma3.it
How did I get here?” (Byrne and Eno. Once in a lifetime—Talking Heads song (Album). Sire Records, Philadelphia, PA; 1980). The problem with development and implementation of large-scale policy into small communities is foundational to the basic conflict in an economics-driven society. That is, economic growth normally depletes resources and reduces ecosystem services leading to negative environmental externalities that, in turn, impacts social welfare. But national policy still places economic growth as a leading indicator of societal success, even if success is achieved to the detriment of the global scarcity of resources, contributing to child mortality, obesity, lack of access to clean water, unsafe communities, uncertain citizenship status, and similar concerns. All these negative environmental conditions crucially influence health conditions, whatever undeveloped, emerging, or industrialized country is considered. Reconciling the differences in this multidimensional political, social, economic, behavioral, life science, and public health dilemma is tricky, at best, due to governing models reliant on a foundation of economics, history, and mathematics—a triple bane of every scholar’s existence. However, the opportunity to generate progressive and sustainable change absent this foundation would otherwise be missed. Thus, this chapter introduces and then unfolds the economic problem in contrast to human development that is at the root of the challenge of implementing national economic policy and the local impact effecting general human development and quality of life. The chapter addresses the application of new metrics supporting economic, human and sustainable development and closes with the application of these metrics towards reasonable constraints of national equitable distribution and global economic expansion. B. A. Fiedler (*) Independent Research Analyst, Jacksonville, FL, USA V. Costantini Department of Economics, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy e-mail: valeria.costantini@uniroma3.it