The detection of gravitational waves and the new era of multi-messenger astronomy
The detection of gravitational waves and the new era of multi-messenger astronomy
复制标题
引力波探测与多信使天文学新时代
DOI:
10.1007/s11433-016-5799-3
复制
发表时间:
2016-02
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
XiLong Fan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
XiLong Fan
For the first time, gravitational waves (GWs), a major prediction of Einstein’s 1915 general theory of relativity (GR), has been detected directly by the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO)[1, Figure 1, Table 1]. On September 14, 2015 at 09: 50: 45 UTC two detectors from LIGO, located at LIGO Hanford, WA, and Livingston, LA sites, detected the coincidental GW event (referred to as GW1509141)). By interpreting the event as having originated from colliding stellar-mass black holes (BHs), the LSC and Virgo collaborations (LVC) also reported the first direct observation of a binary BH system merging to form a single BH [1]. As first obtained by Albert Einstein in 1916, by solving the linearized Einstein’s Equations which are valid for weak gravitational fields, GWs are transverse waves of spatial strain that travel at the speed of light. Observational evidence for these waves was first obtained from the loss in orbital energy of the binary pulsar system PSR B1913+ 16. BHs on the other hand, were first obtained as exact solutions to the vacuum Einstein’s equations, first by Schwarzschild in the static, spherically symmetric case, and then by Kerr in the stationary, axisymmetric case. It was not until much later that people started appreciating the physical significance of these solutions, as BHs. Mathematical studies established the so-called no-hair theorems, which state that BHs are only characterized by their mass, spin and electric charge. The development of BH perturbation theory indicated that BH should be stable, and are plausible end points of gravitational collapse. Perturbative and fully numerical solutions for space-times of collapsing stars and colliding BHs have also been obtained.While strong candidates of BHs have been identified through electromagnetic (EM) observations and predicted from population synthesis theories and numerical simulations of collapses and mergers, space-time structures near black holes have never been probed. GW detection experiments began with Weber’s resonant mass detectors in the 1960s, followed by an international network of resonant detectors. It was later realized that large-scale, laser interferometer GW detectors should have much better sensitivity, over a much broader frequency range. Since the 1990s, an international network of such detectors, including LIGO, VIRGO, GEO 600, TAMA 300, have been built and operated. From 2002 to 2009, a series of operations have been undertaken by the first-generation detectors, without making a positive detection. Advanced LIGO detectors [2] have just completed its first Observation Run (O1), while Advanced VIRGO is in commissioning. KAGRA, the newly constructed Japanese gravitational-wave detector, may start operation in 2017. These detectors use Michelson interferometers with orthogonal arms and mirror-endowed test masses to measure GWs, which could be seen as inducing differential changes in their arm lengths. To observe the remarkably weak GWs, Advanced LIGO detectors have several enhancements to the basic 4 km length Michelson interferometers for minimizing the impact of photo shot noise, and also adopt/develop novel approaches and technique on suspension system and materials in the test masses and their suspensions for reducing the seismic noise and thermal noise, as well as on control systems for reducing the impact of ground motions (see detail in ref.[2]). Two detectors were operating nominally, and their outputs are well calibrated during the GW150914 observation time [2-4].
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/s11433-015-5748-6
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
影响因子:
--
作者:
D. Blair;L. Ju;Chunnong Zhao;L. Wen;Q. Chu;Q. Fang;R. Cai;Jiangrui Gao;Xuechun Lin;
通讯作者:
D. Blair;L. Ju;Chunnong Zhao;L. Wen;Q. Chu;Q. Fang;R. Cai;Jiangrui Gao;Xuechun Lin;
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Duncan A. Brown;K. Vahi;M. Taufer;Von Welch;E. Deelman;Lorena A. Barba;George K. Thiruvathukal
通讯作者:
Duncan A. Brown;K. Vahi;M. Taufer;Von Welch;E. Deelman;Lorena A. Barba;George K. Thiruvathukal
DOI:
10.1007/s11433-015-5738-8
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
影响因子:
--
作者:
V. Mitrofanov;S. Chao;H. Pan;L. Kuo;G. Cole;J. Degallaix;B. Willke
通讯作者:
V. Mitrofanov;S. Chao;H. Pan;L. Kuo;G. Cole;J. Degallaix;B. Willke
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2015-09
期刊:
Journal of materials chemistry. B
影响因子:
--
作者:
Xingjiang Zhu;L. Wen;G. Hobbs;R. Manchester;R. Shannon
通讯作者:
Xingjiang Zhu;L. Wen;G. Hobbs;R. Manchester;R. Shannon
DOI:
10.1007/s11433-015-5747-7
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
Science China Physics,Mechanics & Astonomy
影响因子:
--
作者:
Blair David;Ju Li;Zhao ChunNong;Wen LinQing;Miao Haixing;Cai RongGen;Gao JiangRui;Lin XueChun;Liu Dong;Wu Ling-An;Zhu ZongHong;Hammond Giles;Paik Ho Jung;Fafone Viviana;Rocchi Alessio;Blair Carl;Ma YiQiu;Qin JiaYi;Page Michael
通讯作者:
Page Michael