Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers
Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00643.x
复制
发表时间：
2011-12-01
影响因子：
6.6
通讯作者：
Sturk, Heidi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Haynes, Abby S.;Gillespie, James A.;Sturk, Heidi
背景：公共卫生研究人员对政策制定作出了有限但重要的贡献。一些人通过委员会、咨询委员会、倡导联盟、部长简报、干预设计咨询、与政府的研究伙伴关系，以及在媒体上倡导基于研究的政策，直接参与政策制定。然而，研究利用文献很少关注这些不同的角色以及决策者使用它们的方式。本文描述了政策制定者如何在政策制定中使用研究人员，并研究了这些活动如何与研究利用模型相关。它还探讨了政策制定者对使用研究人员的描述在多大程度上与参与政策的公共卫生研究人员的经验相一致。
Context: Public health researchers make a limited but important contribution to policy development. Some engage with policy directly through committees, advisory boards, advocacy coalitions, ministerial briefings, intervention design consultation, and research partnerships with government, as well as by championing research-informed policy in the media. Nevertheless, the research utilization literature has paid little attention to these diverse roles and the ways that policymakers use them. This article describes how policymakers use researchers in policymaking and examines how these activities relate to models of research utilization. It also explores the extent to which policymakers accounts of using researchers concur with the experiences of policy-engaged public health researchers.