5 ROBUST TRAIT DIMENSIONS - DEVELOPMENT, STABILITY, AND UTILITY
5 ROBUST TRAIT DIMENSIONS - DEVELOPMENT, STABILITY, AND UTILITY
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00480.x
复制
发表时间：
1989-06-01
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
DIGMAN, JM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DIGMAN, JM
近年来，人们对组织人格特征的五因素模型越来越感兴趣。给出了该模型的发展简史。很明显，该模型在评分者和被评分者的差异以及跨语言的情况下非常通用。还有证据表明，人格量表的结构反映了该模型。尽管证明该模型的大多数研究都利用了自我报告清单或依赖于评级，但有明确的证据表明，评级和清单都与实际行为密切相关。检查了五因素模型的证据，包括根据模型组织的特征随时间的稳定性的数据。本研究中特别关注的一个特征是因素 3，通常被解释为尽责性，但这里称为“成就意愿”，因为它与正式的教育成就衡量标准高度相关 研究表明，这一维度是导致能力倾向衡量标准无法解释的大部分成就差异的原因
Interest has grown in recent years in a five‐factor model for the organization of personality characteristics A brief history of the development of this model is given It is evident that the model is very general across variations in raters and ratees and across languages There is also evidence that the structure of personality inventories reflects this model Although most of the studies that have demonstrated the model have utilized either self‐report inventories or have relied on ratings, there is clear evidence that both ratings and inventories are importantly related to actual behavior A longitudinal study of children's personality traits is reported Evidence for the five‐factor model is examined, including data for the stability over time of characteristics organized in terms of the model One trait of particular focus in this study has been Factor 3, often interpreted as Conscientiousness but here referred to as Will to Achieve because of its high correlations with formal measures of educational achievement Studies indicate that this dimension is responsible for much of the variance in achievement left unexplained by aptitude measures