Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid? Biochemical measures, randomized response, and the bogus pipeline in smoking behavior.
Are self-reports of adolescent deviance valid? Biochemical measures, randomized response, and the bogus pipeline in smoking behavior.
复制标题
青少年越轨行为的自我报告有效吗？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1983
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Lauer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Akers;J. Massey;William T. Clarke;R. Lauer
在一项关于中西部社区青少年吸烟（7-12年级学生受访者）的调查中，采用了两种问卷回答效度的测量方法。通过对匿名“随机应答”工具的应答和吸烟的生化指标（唾液硫氰酸盐）验证对保密问卷的应答。这两项措施都支持问卷答复的有效性。随机反应测量是一个匿名的自我报告检查的机密自我报告的准确性，和生化措施提供了一个强大的有效性措施，不受故意造假的问题。响应的有效性并没有显着影响引入了“假管道”的条件。在社会学研究中，获得自我行为报告的标准技术面临着一个标准问题，即实际行为与报告之间可能存在的差异。无论测量的行为如何，口头或书面行为报告的有效性都存在争议，但如果访谈或调查问卷中要求的信息是敏感的，可能会导致犯罪或令人尴尬的，则尤为突出。[1]由于这个原因，自我报告技术被认为不适用于越轨行为的研究，直到20世纪50年代和60年代初的犯罪自我报告研究（Akers; Clark and Wenninger; Short and Nye）。从那时起，自我报告已成为最常用的措施 * 这里报告的研究是由国家儿童健康和人类发展研究所的资助#HD 00376（R。W.劳尔和R. L. Akers，共同主要研究者），以及国家心脏、肺和血液研究所资助#HL 14230（动脉粥样硬化SCOR）和资助#HLRO 1 -20124（R. M.劳尔，主要研究者）。? 1983北卡罗来纳州大学出版社
Two measures of questionnaire response validity were used in a survey of teenage smoking (student respondents in grades 7-12) in a midwest community. Responses to a confidential questionnaire were validated by responses to an anonymous ""randomized response" instrument and a biochemical measure of smoking (salivary thiocyanate). Both measures support the validity of questionnaire responses. The randomized response measure is an anonymous self-report check on the accuracy of confidential self-reports, and the biochemical measure provides a strong validity measure that is not subject to the problems of deliberate faking. The validity of responses was not significantly affected by the introduction of a "bogus pipeline" condition. In sociological research the standard technique of obtaining self-reports of behavior faces a standard problem, the possible or probable discrepancy between the actual behavior and the report of it. The validity of oral or written reports of behavior is at issue regardless of the behavior measured, but it is especially salient if the information asked for in the interview or survey questionnaire is sensitive, potentially incriminating, or embarrassing. 1 For this reason, the self-report technique was considered inapplicable to studies of deviant behavior until self-report studies of delinquency in the 1950s and early 1960s (Akers; Clark and Wenninger; Short and Nye). Since then, self-report has become the most frequently applied measure of *The research reported here was supported by Grant #HD 00376 of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R. W. Lauer and R. L. Akers, Co-principal Investigators), and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant #HL 14230 (SCOR in Atherosclerosis), and Grant #HLRO1-20124 (R. M. Lauer, Principal Investigator). ? 1983 The University of North Carolina Press