Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.
Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.249
复制
发表时间：
2007-02
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
K. Sassenberg;K. Jonas;J. Shah;Paige C. Brazy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Sassenberg;K. Jonas;J. Shah;Paige C. Brazy
目前的研究将监管契合假说（E. T. Higgins, 2000）应用于群体评价，认为个体对群体的评价取决于群体对其监管需求的契合程度。具体来说，据预测，更高权力的群体更适合那些以晋升为重点的个人，也更受他们的重视，因为这些群体提供了更好的机会来维持培养和成就需求。另一方面，权力较低的群体被预测更适合并更受那些以预防为重点的个人的重视，因为这些群体需要（并因此维持）对安全和保障的关注。五项研究通过评估和操纵监管焦点和群体权力，以及使用群体吸引力的显性和隐性测量方法，发现了对这些预测的支持。此外，这些调节契合效应只发生在群体权力上，而不发生在群体地位的普遍差异上。
The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternatively, lower power groups were predicted to fit and be more valued by those individuals with a prevention focus because these groups necessitate (and thus sustain) a focus on safety and security. Five studies found support for these predictions by both assessing and manipulating regulatory focus and group power and by using explicit and implicit measures of group attraction. Moreover, these regulatory fit effects occurred specifically for group power and not for general differences in group status.