A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories From Inside The Supreme Court
A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories From Inside The Supreme Court
复制标题
一场精彩的争吵：美国顶级法律记者分享最高法院内部的故事
DOI：
10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00433_6.x
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
William Haltom
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
William Haltom
大多数教师对Elk Grove联合学区诉Newdow案（2004年）的熟悉程度远远超过对佐治亚州福赛斯县诉民族主义运动案（1992年）的熟悉程度，在这两起案件中，诉讼当事人都坚持在法庭上代表自己。除其他事项外，这些章节阐明了先例的制作以及对手战略和战术的构建；法官对辩护律师关于替代方案、后果和假设的调查；灵活性的重要性，快速，和幸福在紧张的法医设置；以及如何在不激怒法官的情况下说服法官，因为法官可能会以挫败诉讼当事人设计的方式转移论点。
Most instructors will be far more familiar with Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004) than with Forsyth County, Georgia v. the Nationalist Movement (1992), in each of which litigants insisted on representing themselves before the Court. Among other things, these chapters illuminate the crafting of precedents and construction of strategies and tactics by adversaries; the justices' probing of advocates concerning alternatives, consequences, and hypotheticals; the importance of flexibility, fleetness, and felicity in a taut forensic setting; and the challenges of reaching justices open to persuasion without antagonizing justices who may sidetrack arguments in ways that defeat litigants' designs.