Father involvement in parent training: When does it matter?
Father involvement in parent training: When does it matter?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15374424jccp3204_13
复制
发表时间：
2003-12-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Eyberg, SM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bagner, DM;Eyberg, SM
我们研究了父亲参与对治疗的影响。参与者为参加亲子互动治疗（PCIT）的107个家庭，其中包括56个有参与父亲（IF）家庭、16个无参与父亲（UF）家庭和35个缺席父亲（AF）家庭。尽管来自 AF 家庭的母亲报告的治疗结果比来自 IF 家庭的母亲更好，但所有组在治疗期间均表现出改善，处于艾伯格儿童行为量表 (ECBI) 的平均范围内。贝克抑郁量表（BDI）和育儿压力指数（PSI）也有所改善，但没有组间差异。在 4 个月的随访中，IF 家庭的母亲在 ECBI 上保持了治疗效果。相比之下，房颤家庭的母亲在随访中报告显着下降，尽管她们的分数仍处于正常范围内。结果表明，父亲参与治疗可能不会影响即时治疗结果，但可能有助于维持 PCIT 的有益效果。
We examined the impact of father involvement on treatment. Participants were 107 families enrolled in parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT), including 56 involved-father (IF)families, 16 uninvolved-father (UF)families, and 35 absent-father (AF) families. All groups showed improvements during treatment to within the average range on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), although mothers from AF families reported better treatment outcome than mothers from IF families. Improvements occurred on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) as well, but there were no group differences. At a 4-month follow-up, mothers in IF families maintained treatment gains on the ECBI. In contrast, mothers in AF families reported significant decline at follow-up, although their scores remained within the normal range. Results suggest that father participation in treatment may not affect immediate treatment outcome but may help to maintain the beneficial effects of PCIT.