Going beyond The three worlds of welfare capitalism:: regime theory and public health research

Going beyond The three worlds of welfare capitalism:: regime theory and public health research
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/jech.2007.064295
复制
发表时间:
2007-12-01
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
Bambra, C.
Bambra, C.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bambra, C.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

关于健康的社会决定因素的国际研究已越来越多地开始纳入福利国家制度的观点。尽管这是值得欢迎的,但迄今为止,人们对埃斯平-安徒生的《福利资本主义的三个世界》(1990)的依赖过度了。尽管它受到了广泛的批评,而且实际上在比较社会政策文献中存在许多相互竞争的福利国家类型。本文的目的是为公共卫生研究人员提供福利国家制度文献的最新概述,以便在未来的研究中更准确地反映出来。它概述了福利资本主义类型的三个世界,并介绍了它所受到的批评和其他福利国家类型的概述。最后,它提出了公共卫生研究的新途径,可以通过借鉴更广泛的福利国家制度文献来探索。
International research on the social determinants of health has increasingly started to integrate a welfare state regimes perspective. Although this is to be welcomed, to date there has been an over-reliance on Esping-Andersen's The three worlds of welfare capitalism typology ( 1990). This is despite the fact that it has been subjected to extensive criticism and that there are in fact a number of competing welfare state typologies within the comparative social policy literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide public health researchers with an up-to-date overview of the welfare state regime literature so that it can be reflected more accurately in future research. It outlines The three worlds of welfare capitalism typology, and it presents the criticisms it received and an overview of alternative welfare state typologies. It concludes by suggesting new avenues of study in public health that could be explored by drawing upon this broader welfare state regimes literature.