Gender and the evaluation of research
Gender and the evaluation of research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.005
复制
发表时间：
2014-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Walker, James T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brooks, Chris;Fenton, Evelyn M.;Walker, James T.
本研究通过小组评估和期刊评分表来检验性别是否以及如何与研究评价相关。使用英国商学院的数据，我们发现没有证据表明提交小组评估的材料中女性的比例会影响提交机构获得的分数。然而，我们确实发现，根据一些期刊评级列表，女性平均得分较低。男女在各分支学科发表的期刊的评级质量存在重大差异，男性在评级最高的会计、信息管理和战略期刊上发表的研究论文要多得多。此外，能够利用网络与机构外的个人合著的妇女能够在评级较高的期刊上发表文章，尽管男子的情况并非如此;根据期刊评级表，被归因于“工作人员个人情况”（如产假或兼职工作）的妇女得分较低。(C)2014爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
This study examines if and how gender relates to research evaluation via panel assessment and journal ratings lists. Using data from UK business schools we find no evidence that the proportion of women in a submission for panel assessment affected the score received by the submitting institution. However, we do find that women on average receive lower scores according to some journal ratings lists. There are important differences in the rated quality of journals that men and women publish in across the sub-disciplines with men publishing significantly more research in the highest rated accountancy, information management and strategy journals. In addition, women who are able to utilise networks to co-author with individuals outside their institution are able to publish in higher-rated journals, although the same is not true for men; women who are attributed with "individual staff circumstances" (e.g. maternity leave or part-time working) have lower scores according to journal ratings lists. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.