A Collaborative Approach to Defining the Usefulness of Impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners

A Collaborative Approach to Defining the Usefulness of Impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners
复制标题

定义影响力有用性的协作方法:来自学者和社会工作从业者的知识交流项目的经验教训

DOI:
10.1332/174426412x654040
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mark Smith
Mark Smith
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Heather Wilkinson;Michael Gallagher;Mark Smith

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文报告了一个由六个地方当局社会工作部门的学者和从业者参与的知识交流项目。它促进了最近关于共同生产知识的辩论,提出了三个关键领域的结果:关系对知识交流的重要性;对从事学术活动的从业者来说,什么是有效的;以及从业者研究对促进知识交流的价值。它还考虑了针对卓越研究框架不断变化的格局对“影响”的评估,认为学术和绩效管理的影响和研究质量的概念有可能掩盖研究用户的视角。
This paper reports on a knowledge exchange project involving academics and practitioners in six local authority social work departments. It contributes to recent debates about the coproduction of knowledge, presenting findings in three key areas: the importance of relationships for knowledge exchange; 'what works' for practitioners engaging with academics; and the value of practitioner research for enabling knowledge exchange. It also considers the assessment of 'impact' against the shifting landscape of the Research Excellence Framework, arguing that academic and performance management notions of impact and research quality risk eclipsing the perspectives of research users.