The application of the preschool Child Behavior Checklist and the caregiver-teacher report form to Mainland Chinese children: syndrome structure, gender differences, country effects, and inter-informant agreement.
The application of the preschool Child Behavior Checklist and the caregiver-teacher report form to Mainland Chinese children: syndrome structure, gender differences, country effects, and inter-informant agreement.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10802-010-9452-8
复制
发表时间：
2011-02
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Leung, Patrick W. L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liu, Jianghong;Cheng, Halina;Leung, Patrick W. L.
关键词：
学龄前儿童一直是精神病理学研究中被忽视的群体。Achenbach经验评估系统（ASEBA）包括儿童行为清单/1.5-5（CBCL/1.5-5）和护理人员-教师报告表（C-TRF），是少数可用的评估学龄前儿童的措施，具有经验性学前精神病理学分类法。然而，学龄前精神病理学的测量和分类对中国人的效用在很大程度上是未知的，也没有被研究。本研究旨在检验CBCL/1.5-5和C-TRF的跨文化因素效度，以及它们所体现的学龄前精神病理学分类的适用性，中国大陆的学龄前儿童。我们的中国样本和原始美国样本之间的国家效应，性别差异，以及教师和家长之间的交叉信息一致性也将被检查。中文版的CBCL/1.5-5和C-TRF分别由家长和教师完成，在中国大陆的876名学前儿童。验证性因素分析（CFA）证实了原始的，美国-推导出的二阶多因素模型最适合中国学龄前儿童CBCL/1.5-5和C-TRF的数据。中国学龄前儿童总体行为问题发生率与美国学龄前儿童基本相似。具体来说，中国学龄前儿童得分较高的内化问题，而美国学龄前儿童得分较高的外化问题。中国学龄前男孩的外化问题发生率显著高于中国学龄前女孩。与美国原始样本相比，中国教师和家长之间的交叉信息一致性相对较低。研究结果支持美国的学龄前精神病理学分类结构在中国的普遍适用性，以及CBCL/1.5-5和C-TRF中文版的适用性。
Preschool children have long been a neglected population in the study of psychopathology. The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), which includes the Child Behavior Checklist/1.5-5 (CBCL/1.5-5) and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF), constitutes the few available measures to assess preschoolers with an empirically derived taxonomy of preschool psychopathology. However, the utility of the measures and their taxonomy of preschool psychopathology to the Chinese is largely unknown and has not been studied. The present study aimed at testing the cross-cultural factorial validity of the CBCL/1.5-5 and C-TRF, as well as the applicability of the taxonomy of preschool psychopathology they embody, to Mainland Chinese preschoolers. Country effects between our Chinese sample and the original U.S. sample, gender differences, and cross-informant agreement between teachers and parents were also to be examined. A Chinese version of the CBCL/1.5-5 and C-TRF was completed by parents and teachers respectively on 876 preschoolers in Mainland China. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the original, U.S.-derived second order, multi-factor model best fit the Chinese preschool data of the CBCL/1.5-5 and C-TRF. Rates of total behavior problems in Chinese preschoolers were largely similar to those in American preschoolers. Specifically, Chinese preschoolers scored higher on internalizing problems while American preschoolers scored higher on externalizing problems. Chinese preschool boys had significantly higher rates of externalizing problems than Chinese preschool girls. Cross-informant agreement between Chinese teachers and parents was relatively low compared to agreement in the original U.S. sample. Results support the generalizability of the taxonomic structure of preschool psychopathology derived in the U.S. to the Chinese, as well as the applicability of the Chinese version of the CBCL/1.5-5 and C-TRF.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
0.6
作者：
CHAO, RK
通讯作者：
CHAO, RK
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Ivanova, Masha Y.;Achenbach, Thomas M.;Verhulst, Frank C.
通讯作者：
Verhulst, Frank C.
DOI：
10.1097/00004703-200412000-00004
发表时间：
2004-12-01
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Deng, SY;Liu, XC;Roosa, MW
通讯作者：
Roosa, MW
DOI：
10.1080/15374410701444363
发表时间：
2007-07-01
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Ivanova, Masha Y.;Achenbach, Thomas M.;Verhulst, Frank C.
通讯作者：
Verhulst, Frank C.