Is Alternative Development Undersupplied? Examination of Residential Preferences and Choices of Northern California Movers
Is Alternative Development Undersupplied? Examination of Residential Preferences and Choices of Northern California Movers
复制标题
DOI：
10.3141/2077-13
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Cao, Xinyu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cao, Xinyu
以往的研究表明，有一个未满足的需求，行人和交通导向的发展。然而，这些研究大多采用状态选择法，有许多固有的缺点。此外，将冲突的住宅属性组合到假设情况中可能会扭曲消费者的选择。通过使用北方加州搬家公司的数据，一项新的研究采用了另一种方法来探讨这个问题，即，研究交通和土地使用偏好在住宅选择中的优先级以及这些属性的偏好和感知之间的差异。结果发现，交通系统和不同的土地使用的可达性的偏好是次要的住宅选择，搬家的可达性属性的感知平均超过他们的偏好相应的属性，和一小部分的搬家经历了所有的可达性特征的不和谐，但。靠近工作场所。因此，研究报告不能支持替代发展供应不足的论点。
Previous studies suggest that there is an unmet demand for pedestrian and transit-oriented development. However, most of these studies used the stated-choice method, which has many inherent disadvantages. Further, combining conflicting residential attributes into hypothetical situations may distort consumer choices. By using data of Northern California movers, a new study adopted an alternative approach to exploring this issue, namely, examining the priority of transportation and land-use preferences in residential choice and the discrepancy between preferences for and perceptions of these attributes. It was found that preferences for accessibility to transportation systems and different land uses are secondary in residential choice, movers' perceptions of accessibility attributes on average exceed their preference for corresponding attributes, and a small share of movers experienced dissonances of all accessibility characteristics but. proximity to workplace. Therefore, the study fails to support the argument of the undersupply of alternative development.