Uncovering the intellectual development of the Journal of Organizational Change Management: A knowledge‐stock and bibliometric study, 1995‐2011
Uncovering the intellectual development of the Journal of Organizational Change Management: A knowledge‐stock and bibliometric study, 1995‐2011
复制标题
揭示《组织变革管理杂志》的智力发展：知识库和文献计量研究，1995-2011
DOI：
10.1108/09534811311328335
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
David Autissier
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Giraud;David Autissier
- 本研究的目的是确定对组织变革管理杂志（JOCM）的文章影响最大的文件，并分析该杂志的知识结构的演变。设计/方法/方式-知识存量分析进行评估的JOCM的主要趋势。然后，通过对JOCM（1995年至2011年）上发表的文章引用最多的文件进行引用和共引分析，进行了文献计量学研究。结果-通过他们的分析结果，作者：描述知识的JOCM随着时间的推移不断增长的股票;确定具有最强的影响力的JOCM文章的文件;并查明该杂志的知识结构的演变。研究限制/影响-虽然保留的文章样本似乎代表了JOCM出版的努力，数据集提出了一些限制。研究设计和文献计量方法也有一些固有的局限性。本研究的目的是定量概述该杂志的知识演变。实际影响-掌握知识发展的JOCM使研究人员和从业人员更好地了解如何处理的问题，作者谁在这本杂志上发表。这也引发了学术讨论。独创性/价值-这种知识存量和文献计量学研究是第一个被关注的JOCM。
- The purpose of this study is to identify the documents which have had the greatest impact on the Journal of Organizational Change Management (JOCM) articles and to analyze the evolution of the intellectual structure of the journal. Design/methodology/approach - A knowledge-stock analysis is performed to assess major trends of the JOCM. A bibliometric study is then conducted thanks to citation and co-citation analysis about the documents which are the most cited by the articles published in the JOCM (between 1995 and 2011). Findings - Through the results of their analysis, the authors: describe the growing stock of knowledge of the JOCM over time; identify the documents having the strongest influence on the JOCM articles; and pinpoint the evolution of the intellectual structure of the journal. Research limitations/implications - Although the sample of retained articles seems representative of the JOCM publication efforts, the data set presents some limitations. There are also some limits inherent to the research design and to the bibliometric methods. The intention of the present research is to give a quantitative overview of the intellectual evolution of the journal. Practical implications - Grasping the intellectual development of the JOCM enables researchers and practitioners to better understand how issues are being approached by authors who publish in this journal. It also stimulates the scholarly debate. Originality/value - This knowledge-stock and bibliometric study is the first to be concerned with the JOCM.