The adaptive venue shopping framework: how emergent groups choose environmental policymaking venues
The adaptive venue shopping framework: how emergent groups choose environmental policymaking venues
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09644016.2015.1014656
复制
发表时间：
2015-03
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Aaron J. Ley;E. Weber
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aaron J. Ley;E. Weber
学者们成功地提出了几种解释，解释为什么群体选择在不同的场合追求他们的决策目标。一个综合的框架，解释这些群体的选择，通过两个案例研究描述了农业领域燃烧的环境问题的冲突。研究发现，以清除空气中与野外燃烧相关的污染物为使命的紧急、有限理性的团体正在通过战略性评估机构环境来选择场地。重要的特定制度背景涉及三个主要因素：集团的资源组合，对手的资源优势，以及场地的可达性程度。这些最初的选择使团体能够产生新的资源，了解哪些策略有效，哪些策略无效，并根据他们的新资源和学到的东西改变地点。
Scholars have succeeded in producing several explanations for why groups choose to pursue their policymaking goals in different venues. A synthetic framework that explains the choices these groups make is developed through two case studies describing a conflict over the environmental problem of agricultural field burning. Emergent, boundedly rational groups with a mission to clear the air of the pollutants associated with field burning are found to be choosing venues by strategically assessing the institutional context. The particular institutional context that matters involves three primary elements: the group’s mix of resources, opponents’ resource strengths, and the degree of venue accessibility. These initial choices allow groups to generate new resources, to learn about which strategies do and do not work, and to change venues on the basis of their new resources and what they have learned.