Bourdieusian interaction: actors’ habitus, agentic activities and field resources
Bourdieusian interaction: actors’ habitus, agentic activities and field resources
复制标题
布迪厄互动：行动者习惯、主体活动和场域资源
DOI：
10.1108/jbim-01-2020-0015
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Nirundon Tapachai
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Lowe;Nirundon Tapachai
目的
本文旨在探讨将布尔迪欧元框架应用于商业互动和网络中的关系建立的意义。其动机是提倡使用布迪厄的全部作品，而不是孤立地使用次优的选定概念。
设计/方法/方法
这份概念性文件的目的是探讨布尔迪欧框架如何有助于将结构/机构关系理解为商业网络中相互构成的二元性。二元性的概念认为，关系是从结构和代理之间的协同作用中产生的，而结构和代理之间的协同作用是通过“习惯体”的翻译能力来实现的。因此，惯习是结构和中介之间的主要交集、催化剂或交叉，促进了商业关系的既定的、新出现的特性。
发现
布尔迪欧的框架认为，结构和实践是由多种知识形式促成的多重二元性联系在一起的。这一三位一体的框架对结构-机构关系辩论的主要贡献主要体现在“习惯”的概念中，“习惯”被认为是在行为者的资源结构和活动之间提供重要中介的一种翻译工具。它是一个关键概念，帮助我们理解结构和代理行为如何同等重要，并相互构成对商业互动的新属性的影响。对于商业营销来说，这意味着参与者的图式习惯既是具体化的，也是认知性的。习性是新出现的和多样化的资本资源以及有效实践活动所必需的多种技能的主要催化剂。
研究限制/影响
布尔迪奥框架的研究重点是考察对习性、场和实践概念的三元理解，将其作为“泛关系”或相互构成的汞齐的元素，这是由三种类型的知识之间的相应三元关系促成的，即“幻觉”、“幻觉”和“幻觉”。
实际含义
通过采用布尔迪奥的框架，本文可以将持久商业关系的实际发展视为涉及充分协调各方不同习惯、子领域和实践的互动。言下之意是，实践者在使用“幻觉”、“幻觉”和“幻觉”这三种不同的知识形式时，需要具有同等的能力，因为它们之和大于其部分。
原创性/价值
该方法揭示，习惯法强调结构从来不是完全有意识的和经过计算的图式，因为它们包含无意识的、具体化的习惯，这些习惯是由默认的、注入了象征主义、神话和仪式的文化知识推动的，这些知识大多是通过类比推理、叙事、启发式和具体化的手势间接传达的。
Purpose
This paper aims to explore the implications of applying a Bourdieusian meta-framework to business interaction and relationship building within networks. The motive is to advocate the use of Bourdieu’s work in its entirety rather than sub-optimal use of selected concepts in isolation.
Design/methodology/approach
The aim of this conceptual paper is to explore how a Bourdieusian framework benefits understanding of structure/agency relations as a mutually constituted duality within business networks. The concept of duality regard relationships as emergent from synergies between structure and agency made possible by the translational capacity of “habitus”. Habitus is, therefore, the main intersection, catalyst or chiasmus between structure and agency facilitating enacted, emergent properties of business relationships.
Findings
The Bourdieusian framework suggests that structures and practices are related by multiple dualities brokered by multiple knowledge forms. The main contribution that this triadic framework brings to debates on structure-agency relationships is mostly contained in the concept of “habitus”, which is identified as a translation vehicle provides critical brokerage between actors’ resource structures and activities. It is a key concept that helps us understand how structures and agentic behaviours are equally important and mutually constituting influences upon emergent properties of business interaction. For business marketing, this means that the habitus of actors’ schemas are both embodied and cognitive. Habitus acts as the main catalyst for emergent and diverse capital resources and a plural set of skills essential for effective practical activities.
Research limitations/implications
The research focus of a Bourdieusian framework is upon investigating a triadic understanding of concepts of habitus, field and practice as elements of a “pan-relational” or mutually constituted amalgam facilitated by a corresponding triadic relationship between three types of knowledge; namely, “illusio”, “phrónesis” and “poíesis”.
Practical implications
By adopting a Bourdieusian framework, this paper can regard the practical development of durable business relationships as involving interactions that adequately co-ordinate the different habitus, sub-fields and practices of parties as shared. The implication is that the practitioner needs to be equally competent in their use of “illusio”, “phrónesis” and “poíesis” as different knowledge forms whose sum is greater than its parts.
Originality/value
The approach reveals that habitus emphasizes that structures are never entirely conscious and calculated schemas as they contain unconscious, embodied habits fuelled by tacit, cultural knowledge infused with symbolism, mythologies and rituals, which are communicated mostly indirectly through analogical reasoning, narrative, heuristics and embodied gestures.
具有 E8 交叉形式和修正项的 4 流形
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Koya Shimokawa;Kai Ishihara;Yasuyuki Tezuka;松本佳彦;丹下基生
通讯作者：
丹下基生