LANGUAGE USE IN INTERGROUP CONTEXTS - THE LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS
LANGUAGE USE IN INTERGROUP CONTEXTS - THE LINGUISTIC INTERGROUP BIAS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981
复制
发表时间：
1989-12-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
SEMIN, G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MAASS, A;SALVI, D;SEMIN, G
三个实验考察了用于描述群体内和群体外行为的语言类型如何有助于社会刻板印象的传播和持续。两个实验测试了这一假设，即人们对合意的群内和不合意的群内行为和不合意的群外行为的编码和交流比不合意的群内和合意的群外行为更抽象。实验一采用固定反应量表形式，控制了GR Semin和K.Fiedler的语言范畴模型的抽象程度，为这一假说提供了有力的支持。实验2用自由反应的形式得出了相同的结果。实验3证明了抽象沟通与具体沟通在刻板印象的永久化中所起的重要作用。讨论了这些发现的影响和语言范畴模型的使用，以审查交流过程中陈规定型观念的自我延续循环。(《心理信息组织数据库记录》(C)2016年《行政程序法》，保留所有权利)
Three experiments examine how the type of language used to describe in-group and out-group behaviors contributes to the transmission and persistence of social stereotypes. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that people encode and communicate desirable in-group and undesirable out-group behaviors more abstractly than undesirable in-group and desirable out-group behaviors. Experiment 1 provided strong support for this hypothesis using a fixed-response scale format controlling for the level of abstractness developed from GR Semin and K. Fiedler's (see record 1988-20078-001) linguistic category model. Experiment 2 yielded the same results with a free-response format. Experiment 3 demonstrated the important role that abstract versus concrete communication plays in the perpetuation of stereotypes. The implications of these findings and the use of the linguistic category model are discussed for the examination of the self-perpetuating cycle of stereotypes in communication processes.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)