Patterns of self-organization in the context of urban planning: Reconsidering venues of participation
Patterns of self-organization in the context of urban planning: Reconsidering venues of participation
复制标题
城市规划背景下的自组织模式：重新考虑参与场所
DOI：
10.1177/1473095218764225
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
E. Eizenberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Eizenberg
本文通过对城市规划中自组织过程的考察，揭示了城市规划机构与城市居民之间的关系。本文从聚集的透镜来探讨自组织，提出了不同城市行为者自组织的三种类型或模式，并描绘了他们如何以不同的形式采取行动来引发城市变革。这三种自组织类型如下：（1）被剥夺公民权者为基本权利而自组织，（2）普通人为社区利益而自组织，（3）有权势者为经济利益而自组织。在这些不同形式的自组织中，权力和代理由居民、规划机构和物理空间之间的关系不同地构成。此外，这些行为对城市空间的影响也各不相同。然而，群体和行动之间也有一些相似之处，这些相似之处通常是分离的。通过对城市规划中自组织的不同表现形式进行分析，提出了一种更加关系化的解释，强调了正式和非正式规划以及自上而下和自下而上规划之间不可分割和重叠的关系，并提出了对城市权力关系的不同理解。
This article unpacks the relations that exist between the planning institution and urban residents by examining processes of self-organization in planning. Approaching self-organization with the lens of assemblage, the article proposes three categories or patterns of self-organization of different urban actors and portrays how they act in different forms to induce urban change. The three self-organization categories are as follows: (1) self-organization by the disenfranchised for basic rights, (2) self-organization by the ordinary for community interests, and (3) self-organization by the powerful for economic gains. In these different forms of self-organization, power and agency are differentially constituted by the relations between the residents, the planning institution, and the physical space. Moreover, the impacts of these actions on the urban space vary. Nevertheless, there are also some resemblances between groups and actions that are commonly dissociated. Unpacking different manifestations of self-organization in urban planning proposes a more relational interpretation that emphasizes the inextricable and overlapping relations of formal and informal planning and of top-down and bottom-up planning, and surfaces a different understanding of urban power relations.