Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection

Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.27.2.307
复制
发表时间:
2001-03-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Mojardin, AH
Mojardin, AH
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brainerd, CJ;Wright, R;Mojardin, AH

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一种新的方法来衡量虚幻的意识体验的“介绍”的未研究的材料(幻影回忆)进行评估,提取测量直接从识别反应,而不是间接从内省的报告。这种方法的应用在Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式(实验1和2),并在一个更传统的范式(实验3)表明,2个过程(幻影回忆和熟悉)有助于错误识别语义相关的干扰。在DRM范式中,幻影回忆是错误识别关键干扰物的主要因素,但令人惊讶的是,它也是错误识别其他类型干扰物的主要因素。错误识别的变异性与幻影回忆的变异性有关。幻影回忆的实验控制实现了与操纵的动机模糊跟踪理论的假设,这种现象是基于阵风。
A new methodology for measuring illusory conscious experience of the "presentation" of unstudied material (phantom recollection) is evaluated that extracts measurements directly from recognition responses, rather than indirectly from introspective reports. Application of this methodology in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Experiments 1 and 2) and in a more conventional paradigm (Experiment 3) showed that 2 processes (phantom recollection and familiarity) contribute to false recognition of semantically related distractors. Phantom recollection was the larger contributor to false recognition of critical distractors in the DRM paradigm, but surprisingly, it was also the larger contributor to false recognition of other types of distractors. Variability in false recognition was tied to variability in phantom recollection. Experimental control of phantom recollection was achieved with manipulations that were motivated by fuzzy-trace theory's hypothesis that the phenomenon is gist-based.