Parables in the Q Document

此应用程序用于当前项目的扩展。以下原因支持本研究的继续：1)Q文本问题仍然是一个未解决的核心问题。仅仅在学术研究中使用Q批判版是不够的，例如，通过思想实验，试图从马太福音和路加福音的寓言文本中重建马可福音的三个传统寓言文本。在措辞上的显著差异表明，至少就比喻而言，应该放弃通过源批评来重构Q的传统方法。2)方法论问题：中心问题包括：是否有可能避免Q重构的弱点，同时继续接受Q假设和Q的（书面）文本？文学批评对Q学有何贡献？双重传统（马太福音/路加福音）可以通过互文的方法更精确地考虑。在比喻中，基本的隐喻性和叙事性特征被采纳和考虑（例如，隐喻/图像和情节结构/人物即使在措辞明显不同的情况下也保持一定的稳定性）。3)扩展所考虑的段落：除了在《耶稣福音纲要》中列出的耶稣的比喻之外，还有一些由施洗约翰和百夫长在迦百农所说的经文可以并且应该被认为是比喻。4)对专业领域的极大兴趣：会议邀请、SBL q部分的主题以及美因茨的国际会议鼓励了对该主题的更广泛和更广泛的研究。可以预期，该方法将为Q奖学金提供重要的刺激。5)合格的智慧。Mitarbeiter：申请人已经能够确保Dieter T. Roth博士担任律师。为这个项目做准备。作为一个双语学者（德美），他是这个项目的理想人选，因为它需要与英语奖学金密切互动。此外，他在马吉安福音书文本方面的博士工作提供了与第二手证明文本合作的经验，这导致了一个精心构建和方法复杂的方法来研究Q.他的目标是写一本专著，也可以作为habilitationsschrifs提交。Arne Bork是一名获得外部资助奖学金的博士生，他对通过将该方法应用于Q的其他方面（即性格分析）来扩大项目的范围很感兴趣。这项工作和项目之间的联系和互动创造了协同效应。扩大对这个项目的资助将允许对Q分析的方法进行更精细的区分，将这些方法应用于所有Q寓言，并在第一本专门讨论Q寓言的专著中深入介绍结果。

This application is for an extension of a current project. The following reasons support continuing the present research:1) The issue of the text of Q remains an unsolved and central problem. Simply utilizing the Critical Edition of Q in scholarly endeavors is not sufficient as seen, e.g., through the thought experiment of attempting to reconstruct the text of Mark in triple tradition parables from the text of those parables in Matthew and Luke. Significant differences in wording reveal that, at least as far as the parables are concerned, the traditional approach to reconstructing Q through source criticism should be abandoned.2) Methodological questions: Central questions include: Is it possible to avoid the weaknesses of Q-reconstructions while at the same time continuing to embrace the Q-hypothesis and a (written) text of Q? What contribution can literary criticism make to Q scholarship? The double tradition (Matt/Luke) can be considered more precisely through an intertextual methodology. In the parables the foundational metaphorical and narratival characteristics are to be taken up and considered (e.g., metaphors/images and plot structures/characters retain a certain stability even when the wording is significantly different).3) Expansion of the passages considered: In addition to the parables of Jesus listed in the Kompendium der Gleichnisse Jesus, there are verses spoken by John the Baptist and the Centurion in Capernaum that can and should be recognized as parables. 4) Significant interest in professional circles: Invitations to conferences, themes taken up in the SBL Q-section, and an international conference in Mainz have encouraged a broader and more extensive study of the topic. It is to be expected that the approach will provide significant stimuli for Q scholarship.5) Qualified wiss. Mitarbeiter: The applicant has been able to secure Dr. Dieter T. Roth as wiss. Mitarbeiter for the project. As a bilingual scholar (German-American), he is the ideal candidate for this project since it requires intensive interaction with English-language scholarship. Furthermore, his doctoral work on the text of Marcion`s Gospel provided experience in working with secondarily attested texts leading to a carefully constructed and methodologically sophisticated approach to work on Q. His goal is to write a monograph that can also be submitted as a Habilitationsschrift.6) Expansion of the project team: Arne Bork, a doctoral student with an externally funded scholarship, is interested in the broader scope of the project through applying the methodology to other aspects of Q (i.e., character analysis). Contact and interaction between this work and the project creates a synergy effect.Extending the funding for this project would allow for a finer differentiation of the methods of Q-analysis, an application of the methods to all Q parables, and an in-depth presentation of the results in the first monograph dedicated to the Q-Parables.