Collaborative Research: Landscape, Image, and Language Among Some Indigenous People of the American Southwest and Northwest Australia

长期以来，来自不同学科的学者一直试图了解景观元素的视觉表现和语言类别之间的关系。 有一条调查路线试图解决这个问题：不同语言的使用者是用不同的概念思考，还是思维更接近普遍，语言更肤浅？ 这一合作研究项目将调查人们如何对自然景观进行概念化，以及他们如何与自然景观相联系，该项目还将调查一些生活在干旱地区的土著社区使用的景观术语。 语言将是研究的重点。 该项目将研究人们用来指代景观元素的通用术语，以及人们在传统叙事中描述景观的方式。 研究将探讨三个文化和语言群体的成员如何细分，分类，并谈论他们的景观。 这三个群体是亚利桑那州北方和新墨西哥州的纳瓦霍人，亚利桑那州北方的霍皮人，以及西澳大利亚州西北部的Yindjibarndi。 项目研究人员将与三个社区的专家顾问进行深入访谈，了解有关地貌、水体和其他地理特征的词汇。 研究人员将在一个正式的景观本体中表达这些定义，并通过编写图片词典来确认这些定义和术语列表。 研究人员和顾问还将招募这些土著社区的年轻成员拍摄景观重要方面的照片，与长者讨论这些照片的内容，并报告结果。 这些景观的照片也将被展示给讲英语的本科生，以提供英语语言术语的基线解释。该项目将调查景观的表面结构在多大程度上取决于物理现实的原始事实，有多少结构是由于人类感知和认知的其他方面的性质而产生的，以及有多少结构是由文化决定的，语言和生活方式。 这些都是行为科学和认知科学中所有知识领域的基本问题，但它们几乎没有在景观方面得到解决。 该研究旨在了解每个文化群体的文化，历史，灵性和景观之间密切而不同的相互联系。 研究的一个目标是以足够的精确度和严谨性来描述这些民族的景观类别和术语，以使地理信息系统（GIS）能够检测，操纵和推理属于他们的类别和实体。 包括纳瓦霍人和霍皮人在内的一些部落目前正在使用商业地理信息系统管理部落土地，但该软件似乎不能轻易地纳入传统知识，也不能将这些知识与政府来源的技术科学数据结合起来。 在这个项目中吸取的经验教训将指导今后关于地理信息系统跨文化互操作性的工作，并将有助于设计数据库和地理信息系统，供讲不同自然语言的人在其社区内使用，并用于土地和景观的联合管理。 景观术语图片词典还将为有关部落和文化提供材料，通过在学校和其他渠道使用，可能有助于文化保护。

Scholars from a range of disciplines long have sought to understand relationships between visual representations and linguistic categories of landscape elements. One line of inquiry has sought to address the question: Do speakers of different languages think in different concepts, or is thinking more nearly universal and language more superficial? This collaborative research project will investigate how people conceptualize the natural landscape and how they relate to it. The project will investigate landscape terminology used by some indigenous communities living in arid landscapes. Language will be a major focus of the research. The project will study both the generic terms that the people use to refer to elements of the landscape and also the ways that the people describe the landscape in their traditional narratives. The research will examine how members of three cultural and linguistic groups subdivide, classify, and talk about their landscapes. The three groups are the Navajo (Dine) of northern Arizona and New Mexico, the Hopi of northern Arizona, and the Yindjibarndi of the northwestern part of Western Australia. Project researchers will conduct in-depth interviews with expert consultants within the three communities regarding the vocabulary for referring to landforms, water bodies, and other geographic features. Researchers will express the definitions within a formal ontology of the landscape and will confirm the definitions and term lists by compiling pictorial dictionaries. The researchers and consultants also will recruit young members of these indigenous communities to take photographs of significant aspects of the landscape, discuss the content of these photographs with elders, and report results. Photographs of these landscapes also will be shown to English-speaking undergraduate subjects to provide baseline interpretations for English language terminology.The project will investigate the degree to which the apparent structure of the landscape depends upon the raw facts of physical reality, how much of the structure arises due to the nature of human perception and other aspects of cognition, and how much of the structure is determined by culture, language, and lifestyle. These are fundamental issues in the behavioral and cognitive sciences for all knowledge domains, yet they hardly have been address with respect to the landscape. The research seeks to understand the close yet different interconnections among culture, history, spirituality, and landscape for each of the cultural groups. One goal of the research is to characterize these peoples' landscape categories and terminology with sufficient precision and rigor to allow geographic information systems (GIS) to detect, manipulate, and reason about the categories and the entities belonging to them. Some of the tribes, including the Navajo and Hopi, currently are using commercial GIS to manage tribal lands, but it appears that the software cannot readily incorporate traditional knowledge and integrate such knowledge with technoscience data from government sources. Lessons learned in this project will guide future work on cross-cultural interoperability of geographic information systems and will contribute to the design of databases and GISs that can be used by speakers of different natural languages both within their communities and for joint management of lands and landscapes. Pictorial dictionaries of landscape terminology also will provide the tribes and cultures in question with material that may contribute to cultural preservation through use in the schools and other outlets.