Transition Processing Pedagogical rationalities of personal services for guidance and counselling of transitions into work

在过去几年里，为过渡到工作提供个人指导和咨询服务证明是调节现代就业轨迹的一个重要教育工具。与此同时，这一服务领域的特点是不同工具的高度异质性。本研究首次从教育学的角度对不同的个人职业指导服务进行了系统的比较。比较的目的是回答这个问题如何过渡到工作的个人职业指导服务，从而作为教育问题处理。本研究采用多层次分析的方法，探讨个人服务的不同层次的转换过程。对科学（次级分析）、政治（话语分析）和经济（市场分析）知识的分析旨在确定该领域的构成性挑战（领域分析）。二.通过对五个个性化服务的个案分析，试图重构不同层次的过渡过程及其内在的教学合理性。这包括分析组织知识（专家访谈、文件分析、人种学）、对话知识（咨询访谈的对话话语分析）和传记知识（与客户的传记访谈）。三.分析比较的结果提供了新的见解解释模式的这一领域的服务，特别是其固有的教学合理性（结构分析）。因此，本研究项目将首先提供关于这一服务领域的同质性和异质性的研究结果。此外，它将提供有关现代就业轨迹的调节，这是在这一研究领域的理论进步有价值的发现。

Over the last years personal services for guidance and counselling of transitions into work proved to be an important educational instrument in the regulation of modern employment trajectories. At the same time this field of services is characterized by a large heterogeneity of different instruments. This research project conducts a systematic comparison of different personal career guidance services from the perspective of educational studies for the first time. The comparison aims to answer the question how transition to work are shaped by personal career guidance services and thereby treated as educational issues. This project uses the methodology of multilevel analysis to investigate into the different levels of transition processing of these personal services: I. The analysis of the scientific (secondary analysis), the political (discourse analysis) and the economic (market analysis) knowledge aims to the identification of the constitutive challenges of the field (field analysis). II. With a case analysis of five contrastive sampled personal services different levels of transition processing and its inherent pedagogical rationalities are supposed to be reconstructed. This includes the analysis of organizational knowledge (expert interviews, document analysis, ethnography), of conversational knowledge (conversational discourse analysis of counselling interviews) and of biographical knowledge (biographical interviews with clients). III. An analytical comparison of the findings gives new insights into interpretive patterns of this field of services and particularly into its inherent pedagogical rationalities (structural analysis). Hence this research project will provide first of all findings about the homogeneity and heterogeneity of this field of services. Furthermore it will provide findings about the regulation of modern employment trajectories that are of valuable for theoretical advancements in this field of research.