'I would prefer not to'. Organ donation between unease and criticism. A sociological and ethical analysis.

这个项目是我不喜欢的那个项目的续集。器官捐赠在不安和批评之间。在第一阶段，对器官捐赠持怀疑态度的人和尚未决定的人的动机进行了调查，同时对过去20年德国器官捐赠运动的海报进行了调查。主要结果突出了四种类型的批评，这些批评与移植系统中最近发生的事件没有直接联系。然而，他们也在海报中强调了六种不同的道德信息，这些信息在历史上与移植系统的重要事件和中断有关。这些结果表明，在公共话语和卫生政策中，特定的立场和方面被排除在外。在第二阶段，公共话语和健康传播的策略，系统地排除立场，将被重建，以及他们对批评者的后果。此外，这些排斥策略应该被规范地反映出来，以发展有关具体话语包容立场的思想，这些立场目前被认为是非理性的。社会学项目将从理论的角度，质疑这些看似非理性的立场的论点如何被理解为有充分根据的论点。此外，该项目还将分析在日常生活以及卫生政策和学术论述中排除这些立场的战略。特别是，所分析的运动的片面性说明了《移植法》的利益冲突。一方面，卫生政策机构必须就这一主题作出中立的通报，以便作出自主决定。另一方面，应该促进器官捐赠以增加移植数量。因此，生物伦理子项目质疑如何设计公共卫生沟通的规范概念，以实现器官移植中个人自决和集体利益之间的反思性平衡。因此，分析的目的是批判性地解决在这样一个敏感领域中什么是好的信息的问题。此外，支持和反对器官移植的个人态度和道德信念也将得到更好的理解。通过发展社会理论和规范方法，两个子项目旨在对现代高科技医学自我概念的器官移植的高象征价值进行批判性分析。

The project is a sequel to the project I would prefer not to. Organ donation between unease and criticism. In the first stage, the motives of skeptics of organ donation as well as of the undecided were examined along with the posters of German organ donation campaigns of the past 20 years. The main results highlight four types of criticism which are not directly linked to the recent events in the transplantation system. However, they also highlight six different moral messages in the posters that are historically associated with important events and disruptions in the transplantation system. These results indicate that specific positions and aspects are excluded both in the public discourse and in health policy.In the second stage, strategies of the public discourse and of health communication which systematically exclude positions are to be reconstructed as well as their consequences for the critics. Moreover, these strategies of exclusion should be reflected normatively for the development of ideas concerning concrete discursive inclusion of positions that are currently being declassified as irrational.The sociological project will, from a theoretical perspective, question how the arguments of these seemingly irrational positions can be understood as well-founded arguments. In addition, the project will analyse the strategies that exclude these positions in daily life as well as in health policy and the academic discourse.Particularly, the one-sidedness of the analysed campaigns illustrates the conflict of interest of the Transplantation Act. On the one hand, institutions of health policy have to inform neutrally about the topic in order to allow a self-determined decision. On the other hand, organ donation should be promoted to increase the number of transplants. Accordingly, the bioethical subproject questions how a normative concept of public health communication can be designed to achieve a reflective balance between individual self-determination and the collective interest in organ transplants. Therefore, the analysis aims at critically addressing the question of what comprises good information in such a sensitive field. Moreover, the personal attitudes and moral convictions for and against organ transplantation are to be better understood.By developing socio-theoretical and normative approaches, both subprojects aim at a critical analysis of the high symbolic value of organ transplantation for the self-conception of modern high-tech medicine.