Correspondence and afterlife.The letter archive of Ernst Jünger

恩斯特·约格尔（Ernst jenger）去世后，留下了大量系统整理的信件档案，其中包含13万份文件。有大约9万封写给作者的信，来自大约5000位作者，还有大约4万封作者写的信，这些信仍然以抄本或副本的形式存在。信件档案是马尔巴赫德国文学档案馆（DLA）中j<s:1>内格斯文学遗产的一部分。在这里，信件根据发件人、收信人、日期和主题被记录在数据库中。这些信件可以在网上搜索，也可以在现场使用。由于j<s:1>奈格斯的信件数量庞大，以及在他的日记和自传中对这些信件的收录、提及或引用，信件档案已经成为作者作品的一个组成部分和一种纪实的子结构。在20世纪，恩斯特·约格尔作为一个政治活动家，一个文学见证者，作为一个为各种人寻求帮助的人，发挥了重要的作用。因此，他的信件档案是文学史和当代史的极有价值的资料。作为我近年来工作的延续，我想在专著中解释j<s:1>奈格尔的书信活动，在他的作品中使用信件以及他的信件档案的概念。选定的通信版本将伴随专著，以阐明信件档案的来源价值。迄今为止，在研究文献中被编辑和广泛引用的信件仅占投资组合的5%。进一步的出版和通信目录的创建（可能需要几十年才能完成）将不足以解释j<s:1>奈格斯的书信交流和他的信件档案的概念。显然需要进一步和更广泛的作品和档案相关的研究来补充现有的研究，这些研究仅仅触及表面。其目的是展示詹姆士的邮政活动应该如何建立网络和分发他的作品，而信件档案的目的是作为他在后代中的存在的基础。因此，j<s:1>恩格尔成为一种新的作者形式的代表，这种形式可能是对现代主义文学档案建立的反应（继18世纪和19世纪的先驱之后）：作者作为档案保持者。本文的目的是用j<s:1>奈格斯的信件档案作为一个有意识地为死后接受而写的文本集的例子，从而以范例的方式说明现代文学的一种现象。本专著从《钢铁风暴》到《锡布齐格》的主要作品的书信性和纪实性，以及邮政活动的交流目的和对精选信件的解释，来论证约<s:1>恩格尔信件档案的意义及其来源价值。

Upon his death, Ernst Jünger left a copious, systematically assembled letter archive containing 130,000 documents. There are approximately 90,000 letters to the author, coming from about 5,000 writers and approximately 40,000 letters that were written by the author and which still exist in transcripts or copies. The letter archive is part of Jüngers literary legacy contained in the German Literature Archive in Marbach (DLA). Here the correspondence is recorded in a database according to sender, addressee, date, and subject matter. The letters are searchable online and available for use on-site. Due to the sheer volume of Jüngers correspondence and their inclusion, mention or quotation in his diaries and autobiographical writings, the letter archive has become a component and kind of documentary substructure of the author's opus. In the 20th century Ernst Jünger played a significant role as a political activist, as a literary witness, and as a person to turn to for various people. For this reason, his letter archive is an extremely valuable source for both literary and contemporary history. As a continuation of my work in recent years I would like to explain the epistolary activities of Jünger, the use of letters in his work and the conception of his letter archive in a monograph. An edition of selected correspondence will accompany the monograph to elucidate the source value of the letter archive. The correspondence that has hitherto been edited and widely cited in research literature makes up just 5% of the portfolio. Further publication and the creation of a catalogue of correspondence (which will presumably take decades to complete) would not be sufficient to explain Jüngers epistolary communication and the conception of his letter archive. There is a clear need for further and more extensive opus- and archive-related studies to supplement the existing research which barely scratches the surface. The aim is to show the way Jüngers postal activities were supposed to build networks and to distribute his writings while the letter archive was intended to be a basis for his presence in posterity. Jünger thus becomes the representative of a new form of authorship which probably resulted from a reaction to the establishment of literary archives in Modernism (following precursors in the 18th and 19th century): the author as archivist. The intention is to use Jüngers letter archive as an example of a consciously written collection of texts for posthumous reception, thus illustrating paradigmatically a phenomenon of modern literature. The monography focuses on the epistolary and documentary character of Jüngers key works from Storm of Steel to Siebzig verweht, on the communicative purposes of postal activities and on the explanation of selected correspondence to demonstrate the significance of Jüngers letter archive and of its source value.