GRK 2283: Resonant Self–World Relations in Ancient and Modern Socio-Religious Practices

IGDK关注的问题是，仪式化的社会宗教实践如何在历史和当代社会中建立自我世界关系，以及神圣化过程如何稳定这种形式的“共鸣”。这为理解文化体系和社会秩序的差异提供了一把钥匙。将焦点转移到仪式行动的经验上，会导致仪式实践的不同映射和自我世界关系的产生。共鸣概念被用来分析机构、沟通、社会和物质他人以及转变过程的不同组合和层次。仪式化的实践允许自我世界关系的不同种类和品质的产生、习惯化和概念化。它们作为工具，促成、解释和产生有意义的关系，并共同构成超越宗教领域的共鸣关系：文化塑造的情感与共鸣体验相联系，而共鸣体验通过这种做法变得具有宗教意义。第二阶段的研究将集中在四个主题上：重复，对时间顺序进行更细致的观察，仪式的修改和重放的后果;二阶共振，其特征是对这些经历的引用或记忆;权力，代理和共振;以及对象在建立持久关系中的作用。历史和实证分析需要一种描述性和解释性的语言，抓住实践，经验和习惯化的细微差别和差异，如定性研究和批判性来源阅读，物质文化和性别研究以及注释所提供的。我们的IGDK的关系方法允许超越世界观水平的自我世界关系的分析，以充分考虑超越认知解释的经验和物质对象的身体现实性。我们的一套问题允许社会学和历史宗教方法的相互交叉，基于对文化和宗教的共同理解，以及它们作为连续过程的纠缠，这些过程设想了自我和容忍古代和现代社会中“他者”的能力。它将对实践和经验的微观研究与大规模的文化间比较相结合，有望继续为历史和当代实践以及文化变革提供非常新颖的见解。

The IGDK focuses on the question of how ritualised socio-religious practices establish self—world relations in historical and contemporary societies, and how processes of sacralisation stabilise such forms of ‘resonance’. This provides a key to understanding differences in cultural systems and social orders. Shifting the focus to experiences of ritual action leads to a different mapping of ritual practices and the production of self—world relations. The resonance concept is used to analyse different constellations and levels of agency, communication, social and material others, and transformation processes. Ritualised practices allow for the generation, habitualisation and conceptualisation of different kinds and qualities of self—world relations. They serve as tools to enable, interpret and produce meaningful relations and co-constitute resonant relations beyond the religious sphere: culturally shaped sensibilities are linked with experiences of resonance that have become religiously significant through such practices. Research in the second phase will focus on four topics: repetition, taking a more nuanced look at temporal sequencing, modification of rituals and the consequences of replays; second-order resonance, characterised by references to or memory of such experiences; power, agency and resonance; and the role of objects in establishing lasting relations. The historical and empirical analysis demands a descriptive and interpretative language that catches nuances and differences in practice, experience and habitualisation, as provided by both qualitative research and critical source reading, material culture and gender studies, and exegesis. Our relational approach of the IGDK allows for the analysis of self–world relations beyond the level of worldviews to adequately take into account the corporeality of experience and material objects beyond cognitive interpretations. Our set of questions allows for mutual cross-fertilisation of sociological and historical-religious approaches, based on the common understanding of cultures and religions and their entanglement as continuous processes which conceive of the self and the ability to tolerate the ‘Other’ in ancient and modern societies. Its combination of micro-studies of practices and experiences with large-scale inter-cultural comparison promises to continue to provide highly novel insights into historical and contemporary practices and cultural change.