China's November 2013 ADIZ declaration in the East China Sea - Significance, Strategic Motivations, and the Implications for Regional Security.

我收集了大量学术文章和少量与防空识别区有关的书籍，特别是中国2013年11月在东海宣布的防空识别区。我还检索有关防空识别区的合法性和国家与防空识别区（例如，不仅是中国，而且日本，韩国，台湾，美国等）的国际法条款。与国际规范和议定书的关系。中国防空识别区准则与美国防空识别区准则的具体差异（以及这些准则与国际法和条约的定位）是我调查中国2013年防空识别区声明的一个重要因素。我研究的另一个重要方面是调查中国，日本和韩国的语言文件（政府，学术，媒体等）。(as以及更友好的英文文件），以了解在防空识别区问题上的不同立场，特别是中国在东海宣布防空识别区的观点和理由。这些文件揭示了关于中国东海防空识别区与世界其他地方防空识别区有何不同的问题的丰富意见。我把我所有的阅读和写作都放在一个相当大的文件中，目前正在编辑和润色这份文件（同时包括我发现的任何新来源），以便它更像样，并可能准备稍后出版。

I collected numerous academic articles and a small number of books related to ADIZs in general and more specifically to China's November 2013 ADIZ declaration in the East China Sea. I also retrieve international law articles pertaining to the legality of ADIZs and where states with ADIZs (for example not only China but also Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the United States etc.) stand in relation to international norms and protocols. The differences in the specifics of China's ADIZ guidelines versus the US' ADIZ (and where these are positioned or not vis-vis international law and treaties) is an important element of my investigation of China's 2013 ADIZ declaration. Another important aspect of my research has been surveying Chinese, Japanese, and South Korea language documents (governmental, academic, media etc.) (as well as smilier English language documents) in order to understand varying positions on the issue of ADIZ and particularly Chinese perspectives and justifications for their ADIZ declaration in the East China Sea. These documents have revealed a rich array of opinions on the question of how different China's East China Sea ADIZ is to other ADIZs elsewhere in the world. I placed all my readings and writing into a document of considerable volume and am currently editing and polishing this document (while included any new sources I find) so that it is more presentable and possibly ready for publication later.