Internationale Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Konstitutionalisierung - Akteursvielfalt und Kontestation im Bereich gerichtlicher Auseinandersetzung

拟议项目的研究目标包括确定法院和准司法机构（仲裁）正式背景下有关外国投资国际保护的法律话语对全球宪法化的影响。为此目的，本报告集中讨论在投资者与国家争端解决的法律领域对宪法规范的争论，特别是财产权和法治。国际投资仲裁程序最近已成为一个重要的法律领域，尽管其本身的争议越来越大，在跨界范围内对基本宪法原则进行辩论的法律领域正受到越来越多的不同行动者的影响：有人认为，这些正式过程是一个几乎理想的参考领域，对其进行分析将有助于俄罗斯关于全球宪政叙事变化的主要研究问题。因此，该项目将各自的争议做法作为全球宪法争议的一个重要案例进行研究，考虑到所涉及的政府、政府间和非政府行动者的多样性，这种争议实际上是自下而上和自上而下进行的。在第一阶段（第1-3年），该项目(1)重建关于投资者-国家仲裁的主要宪法叙述，特别是关于法治和给予外国投资者产权的适当保护水平；(2)通过-à-vis这些规范识别参与正式争议实践的不同行为主体类别，并选择具体案例进行深入分析；(3)调查是否出现了可能最终导致特定国家和/或非国家行为体群体的规范性物质发生变化的替代叙事。当项目转向这些变化对第二阶段（第4-6年）国际投资仲裁领域的政治和法律权力转移的影响时，结果将通过进一步的研究进行检验

The proposed project's research objective consists in identifying the effects of legal discourses concerning the international protection of foreign investments in the formal context of courts and quasi-judicial bodies (arbitration) on global constitutionalisation. To that end it focusses on the contestation of constitutional norms - such as in particular property rights and the rule of law - in the legal arena of investor-state dispute settlement. International investment arbitration proceedings have recently emerged as an important, albeit in itself increasingly controversial, legal arena for the contestation of fundamental constitutional principles in a transboundary context being shaped by a growing variety of different actors: It is argued that these formal processes are an almost ideal reference field, the analysis of which will contribute to the RU's leading research question regarding the changing narrative of global constitutionalisation. The project therefore studies the respective contestatory practices as an important case of global constitutional contestation that - considering the diversity of governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental actors involved - actually takes place from below and from above.During the first phase (years 1-3) the project (1) reconstructs dominant constitutional narratives on investor-state arbitration in particular with regard to the rule of law and the appropriate level of protection granted to property rights of foreign investors; (2) identifies the different categories of actors that partake in the formal contestatory practices vis-à-vis these norms and selects specific cases for an in-depth analysis; and (3) investigates whether alternative narratives have emerged that may ultimately result in changing normative substances in particular groups of state and/or non-state actors. The results stand to be examined by further research when the project turns to the effect of these changes on political and legal power shifts in the realm of international investment arbitration during the second phase (years 4-6).¿